Is 100% (total) altruism possible?

is it possible to give all of yourself and be 100% selfless in any given situation with anyone or anything? and have no self gain at all.

yes 14
no 32
other? (explain) 4
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 25 )
  • disthing

    My belief is that everything done with intention is done selfishly.

    That's not a negative judgement either. It's just inevitable. You cannot purposely do anything without it in some way being selfish.

    Although perhaps the word 'selfish' is inherently pejorative? I don't know... When I say selfish, I mean done to benefit self - but not necessarily exclusively. Perhaps selfishness means beneficial ONLY to ones self?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • anti-hero

    Yes, by answering this poll. I gain nothing, you get your answer, and I didn't enjoy it at all.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Short4Words

      You got the satisfaction of being heard.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • anti-hero

        I take no satisfaction in that.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • You do, otherwise logically you would never speak unless it was unavoidable.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • anti-hero

            Yes, I would. It is called helping others without gaining anything for yourself. Something a self admitted narcissist like yourself would know nothing about.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • The urge to help comes from feeling, every action is linked to emotion. You may not be consciously aware of it, but that is irrelevant.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
  • bananaface

    Hmm, I guess with any situation you can find something selfish about it. I'd rather not do that when someone does something good, though.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Karmasbitch

    Hmm good question. It depends on whether the satisfaction is intentional satisfaction or not, because completely losing the ego is, from what I hear, very enlightening, and if you lose your ego for the sake of loving humanity, you are in turn going to gain a lot, from that by feeling free of worry and self. Idk if I'm making sense at this point but it seems like no matter what you do, you will always benefit in some way or another.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • HexNectar

    there is a healthy middle point between 100% selfish and 100% altruistic imo

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • sega31098

    No. Even in nature, altruism is intended for the greater good of the species.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Beerminator1

    Total altruism is my goal, but I don't think I will ever reach that...

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • wii3willrule

    Giving yourself to someone else and neglecting yourself is 100% self hatred. People should help each other out, but definitely not at the cost of their own welfare. Self love is vital. Obey the walrus.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • dom180

    I agree with disthing, so my comment is just going to build on what he said.

    I suppose I don't believe in altruism, but in a way it doesn't matter. If I feel an uncontrollable obligation to be selfless, is acting on that feeling altruism or selfishness? The action itself is selfish because I'm only doing it to reconcile my uncontrollable desire to do it, but the outcome (the important part, from the perspective of the rest of the world) is selfless. It's selfish selflessness.

    If you believe in altruism you have to believe in free will, and I'm not sure I believe in free will. In fact, I'm almost sure that I don't. So maybe altruism doesn't exist, but the outcome of selfishly-motivated actions can be selfless.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • not me but others

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • GoraIntoDesiGals

    No, just no.

    Comment Hidden ( show )