Okay. First question. Was the $1 a day you are talking about paid in Australia or the U.S.? Second question. I got $179 using minimum eligibility, no mortgage, electricity, or other expenses from a SNAP website. It was the smallest payment anyone could qualify for. What parameters did you use to get your rediculously low number?
I'm not giving you my details idiot. I don't know why you care regardless. My personal situation has nothing to do with this topic. Is everyone creating spreadsheets on NikkiClaire.
I stated what we received from the government of the U.S based on mine and my fathers incomes at the time and our living expenses and family size. That's how it works.
I see that you did you homework from the last post and no longer assume every individual in a house automatically gets the max amount.
Correction. $179 was the minimum amount. Glad we agree on that.
Next time you're down under with your Dad, have a tasty rock lobster with butter and lemon along with a bit of Chardonnay from the Barrosa valley. As Southern Cross shines down, think about your old friends on SNAP. Poverty sucks doesn't it?
iin what do think of Trump nixing food stamps ,sending food boxes?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Okay. First question. Was the $1 a day you are talking about paid in Australia or the U.S.? Second question. I got $179 using minimum eligibility, no mortgage, electricity, or other expenses from a SNAP website. It was the smallest payment anyone could qualify for. What parameters did you use to get your rediculously low number?
Your go.
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm not giving you my details idiot. I don't know why you care regardless. My personal situation has nothing to do with this topic. Is everyone creating spreadsheets on NikkiClaire.
I stated what we received from the government of the U.S based on mine and my fathers incomes at the time and our living expenses and family size. That's how it works.
I see that you did you homework from the last post and no longer assume every individual in a house automatically gets the max amount.
Well done. At least you looked it up.
--
Rich_Guy
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Correction. $179 was the minimum amount. Glad we agree on that.
Next time you're down under with your Dad, have a tasty rock lobster with butter and lemon along with a bit of Chardonnay from the Barrosa valley. As Southern Cross shines down, think about your old friends on SNAP. Poverty sucks doesn't it?
:-)
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
We eat crayfish, not lobster, in Vic. Facts mate facts.
I don't agree, I just told you what we got.
Hope you never see poverty. You would get your ass kicked daily. Best life to you.
It must be a lot of work managing all those accounts.
--
Rich_Guy
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Oh no. Your character was convincing but it's coming apart. You're not the Melbourne maniac, are you?
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Why cause i got annoyed by your stupidity? Hey, I am human and obviously disslike you, yet you continue....
--
McBean
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Good luck with your 'P' plates. I would suppose that Rich_Guy won't be giving you financial advice anytime soon.