Glad you survived. But, you make it sound as if it is difficult to eat on $3/day, when in fact it is very easy. I would never suggest that working class people shop at Whole Foods like I do.
Yes let's do the math, shall we? SNAP pays $197 per person per month at the present time. You are 19 years old born in 1998. Using an inflation calculator indexed to the CPI, we find that $179 equaled $118.97 when you were born. This would have given you $3.97 per person per day for food back then. Hell, with that much money you could have afforded frozen pizzas.
I can see that analytical skills are not your forte. Yes, you lived in Australia, but the flaming liberals in the labor party want to destroy your ex-home by making it a socialist paradise.
Better Google up the dole on Google.com.au. You're not fooling anybody.
Okay. First question. Was the $1 a day you are talking about paid in Australia or the U.S.? Second question. I got $179 using minimum eligibility, no mortgage, electricity, or other expenses from a SNAP website. It was the smallest payment anyone could qualify for. What parameters did you use to get your rediculously low number?
I'm not giving you my details idiot. I don't know why you care regardless. My personal situation has nothing to do with this topic. Is everyone creating spreadsheets on NikkiClaire.
I stated what we received from the government of the U.S based on mine and my fathers incomes at the time and our living expenses and family size. That's how it works.
I see that you did you homework from the last post and no longer assume every individual in a house automatically gets the max amount.
Correction. $179 was the minimum amount. Glad we agree on that.
Next time you're down under with your Dad, have a tasty rock lobster with butter and lemon along with a bit of Chardonnay from the Barrosa valley. As Southern Cross shines down, think about your old friends on SNAP. Poverty sucks doesn't it?
iin what do think of Trump nixing food stamps ,sending food boxes?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Glad you survived. But, you make it sound as if it is difficult to eat on $3/day, when in fact it is very easy. I would never suggest that working class people shop at Whole Foods like I do.
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Like I said, learn to read, or do math at least. $1 a day.
Whole foods is over priced garbage.
--
Rich_Guy
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Yes let's do the math, shall we? SNAP pays $197 per person per month at the present time. You are 19 years old born in 1998. Using an inflation calculator indexed to the CPI, we find that $179 equaled $118.97 when you were born. This would have given you $3.97 per person per day for food back then. Hell, with that much money you could have afforded frozen pizzas.
I can see that analytical skills are not your forte. Yes, you lived in Australia, but the flaming liberals in the labor party want to destroy your ex-home by making it a socialist paradise.
Better Google up the dole on Google.com.au. You're not fooling anybody.
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That's not how it works. It's based on relative income, family size and a set of living expenses such as mortgage/rent, electricity etc.
Nice try.
--
Rich_Guy
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Okay. First question. Was the $1 a day you are talking about paid in Australia or the U.S.? Second question. I got $179 using minimum eligibility, no mortgage, electricity, or other expenses from a SNAP website. It was the smallest payment anyone could qualify for. What parameters did you use to get your rediculously low number?
Your go.
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm not giving you my details idiot. I don't know why you care regardless. My personal situation has nothing to do with this topic. Is everyone creating spreadsheets on NikkiClaire.
I stated what we received from the government of the U.S based on mine and my fathers incomes at the time and our living expenses and family size. That's how it works.
I see that you did you homework from the last post and no longer assume every individual in a house automatically gets the max amount.
Well done. At least you looked it up.
--
Rich_Guy
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Correction. $179 was the minimum amount. Glad we agree on that.
Next time you're down under with your Dad, have a tasty rock lobster with butter and lemon along with a bit of Chardonnay from the Barrosa valley. As Southern Cross shines down, think about your old friends on SNAP. Poverty sucks doesn't it?
:-)