Why not just call it something other than "marriage"? But aparently thats not good enough. I don't think it's about civil rights anymore, because gays won't do that. It's just a case of wanting to feel special and throw a big party!
I believe all religions are bigger and more important than a few people who want to put a ring on their finger.
Because civil unions don't have ALL the same rights as marriage in America. If they had all the same rights I would not care what you call it. So you think they don't deserve the same rights because of the way they were born?
Nope, i think they deserve the right to a binding institution. Just not the institution that was founded under a god that hates them and by a religion thats laws are against them. You wouldn't go to a nazi rally if you were jewish would you.
I just find the whole thing so petty. I don't follow the bible, but i sure as shit don't think it should be shit on just so a few people can wear a ring. It's such a weak argument really.
No you're being a little ignorant there, i'm saying changing the name so as not to impact a religion but giving gays a binding institution means everyone wins. Equal rights for all, religion included. Your idea is only of benifit to gays, thats not equal.
I have now said twice (if you will read) that I don't care about the name. I care about the rights. Call it whatever you want (for the 3rd time) as long as the rights are the same. Fuck man learn to read.
IIN to think that parents raising their children religiously should...
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Why not just call it something other than "marriage"? But aparently thats not good enough. I don't think it's about civil rights anymore, because gays won't do that. It's just a case of wanting to feel special and throw a big party!
I believe all religions are bigger and more important than a few people who want to put a ring on their finger.
--
anti-hero
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Because civil unions don't have ALL the same rights as marriage in America. If they had all the same rights I would not care what you call it. So you think they don't deserve the same rights because of the way they were born?
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Nope, i think they deserve the right to a binding institution. Just not the institution that was founded under a god that hates them and by a religion thats laws are against them. You wouldn't go to a nazi rally if you were jewish would you.
I just find the whole thing so petty. I don't follow the bible, but i sure as shit don't think it should be shit on just so a few people can wear a ring. It's such a weak argument really.
--
anti-hero
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
So we are debating over a fucking name? I don't care about the name. I care about equal rights for all.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No you're being a little ignorant there, i'm saying changing the name so as not to impact a religion but giving gays a binding institution means everyone wins. Equal rights for all, religion included. Your idea is only of benifit to gays, thats not equal.
But oh no we can't have that can we.
--
anti-hero
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I have now said twice (if you will read) that I don't care about the name. I care about the rights. Call it whatever you want (for the 3rd time) as long as the rights are the same. Fuck man learn to read.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
I did read it silly, but what you're saying is actually what i'm saying just not as well lol.