If it infringes on religious practice it should be excepted.
I also don't see why a person, who has lived a lifestyle that CAN provide, in ways other than cash, can't be allowed to provide in those ways. I don't see it reasonable to expect or force such a person to abandon their lifestyle for some random job just to make a minimal support payment. Their partner accepted this lifestyle prior to having the child so it should remain acceptable. That shouldn't magically change. If the food provided was OK before, it should still be OK now, if it isn't then why did you have a kid with this person?
IIN to think Child Support Is Unfair!
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
If we accept that both parties will be inconvenienced either way, why make any special exceptions?
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If it infringes on religious practice it should be excepted.
I also don't see why a person, who has lived a lifestyle that CAN provide, in ways other than cash, can't be allowed to provide in those ways. I don't see it reasonable to expect or force such a person to abandon their lifestyle for some random job just to make a minimal support payment. Their partner accepted this lifestyle prior to having the child so it should remain acceptable. That shouldn't magically change. If the food provided was OK before, it should still be OK now, if it isn't then why did you have a kid with this person?