Ask Your Question today
It takes me about 5 seconds to get a boner but I can lose it just as fast. It's not a problem when I'm masturbating because I just cum normally, but I was worried that a girl might think I don't like her if she sees I can't stay hard or that I will sometimes be hard and sometimes not (even though I'm still turned on)?
ROFL - In porn they have "fluffers" just off camera too. (A fluffier is a girl ready to suck on the actor's cock the instant he starts to go down).
No 1: don't you realise porn is edited to make it appear certain things go on and on for much longer than they actually do?
No 2: Viagra and similar drugs have replaced "fluffers", people whose job it was to get the male actors erect again as needed. What longterm effects this may have because of the raised blood pressure no-one knows, but I don't imagine the porn industry gives a stuff (pun unintended but I'll leave it anyway).
Unless you're considering porn as a career, either forget about what you see in porn of if you can't do that, remind yourself that it's acting and you don't have to measure up to porn actors. After all, did you expect to be able to fly after you watched superman movies?
Well, stop watching so much porn, it's garbage! Don't compare yourself or anyone else to the people in porn, because it's dehumanizing.
In general you're right, but porn isn't really the problem here. He thinks that staying turned on is how he is being judged by his partner. In reality, keeping his partner turned on by sensitive touch, and tactile responsiveness (which I am very good at) is much more important to her. Emotional sensitivity counts BIG TIME.
I always say a good fuck starts hours before the event. Thoughtfulness, courtesy, and attentiveness take time to generate the right mood. Unfortunately for me, attractiveness does as well.
Oded here, Cialis and Viagara are a good start for them however some use other alternatives unto getting errection.
Oded....out
It's a sign of early onset of ED..
Unfortunately , Viagra and Cialis cost $ 50 a pill.
If they last for 4 hours as they claim on commercials on tv , I guess $ 12.50 an hour is worth it , as long as a man can cum at least once an hour for 4 consecutive hours.
The FDA says there are no plans to make a generic for either Viagra or Cialis until at least May 2018.
Why would they seeing that men need it and they are willing to pay $ 50 a pill.
So , why make a generic that would only cost $ 1 - $ 2 a pill.
Pfizer will be losing a fortune.
Obviously , men will choose the cheaper option.
Talking about guys not being able to keep a boner is dissapointing lol
Like 30 years ago im sure we would never have this problem
its the food that is hurting our dicks lol
Oh so male impotence wasn't around 30 years ago? I can assure you it was: the bloke I eventually married in 1965 (that's more than FIFTY years ago just in case you can't do the maths) was impotent for about a year when we first got together.
You really do come up with some bullshit, don't you? A tiny minute amount of googling would've told you impotence has existed as far back as written records have existed.
Oh and Im guessing your the one who downvoted me for no reason?
Calm the fk down. Im making a valid point. Just because you had one guy who couldnt fking get a boner, doesnt mean EVERY guy in your age group also cant get a boner.
I dont know if you do any thinking these days, or observing of the world around you, but if you did, you would REALIZE that VIAGRA DIDNT EXIST 30 YEARS AGO!
I didn't downvote you. I was quite calm when I responded and still am.
I didn't say or imply that because one bloke was impotent they all were, I was merely making a valid point out in response to you saying "Like 30 years ago im (sic) sure we would never have this problem", that impotence did exist even longer than 30 years ago. You didn't make it clear that your 30 year time frame had anything to do with viagra