If a guy had sex after knowing a girl for 2 days...would you call him a whore? It's her body and her choice, I would advise protection as others have done.
And what the hell has spelling got to do with emotional and physical maturity?
Actually yes, I would call that guy a womanizer or manwhore but that's me.
Yes it's her body, but the question is if she should or shouldn't.
Protection if she should but if she wants to have a long loving relationship, she shouldn't with a guy who wants sex immediately.
Spelling is often linked to intelligence, therefore a person who doesn't know the difference between "know" and "no" probably doesn't have the capacity to think coital sexual relationships through.
And I'd call him a manwhore. Promiscuity has nothing to do with sex, if a man or woman sleeps with someone after two days of knowing him he/she is promiscuous or a manwhore/slut.
Who says spelling is linked to intelligence? And since when has common sense had much to do with intelligence? Some of our most famous geniuses have had dyslexia. Ridiculous assumption for anyone to make, plus it could have been a basic mistake if they didn't go back and re-read it.
As for having sex with someone within 2 days of knowing them, that's their choice. Not mine admittedly but still a choice. They may feel very comfortable with that person in a short space of time and have a 'connection'. Or they may not be looking for anything serious, just some fun (as long as they are safe).
While it is perfectly acceptable to have different standards for yourself, to call someone else a slut for choosing to sleep with someone sooner rather than later is not. What is right for you is not right for the rest of the world, or do you believe all people need to have the same moral standards as you do? If so then I beg you to take a step back and consider how boring the world would be if there were no diversity.
Now with that said, being free with your sexuality is not being a slut, for neither a man nor woman. Not everyone holds some belief that sex is some magical thing only shared between people who have been together x amount of time and have done a, b, and c first to prove that theyre not a "slut".
Religion plays a big role in this mindset, and it seems that while people turn away from religion more and more frequently, they still hold on to archaic ideas perpetuated by the very thing they now abhor. Sleeping with someone after 2 days or a week or even a night does not have to correlate with low respect for oneself. If they want to connect in a physical way, then by all means let them.
I do agree that this girl doesnt seem like she should be having sex, but thats kinda beside the point here, as I'm remarking on your judgement of this kind of behavior.
IIN to have sex with a boy after two days of knowing him?
← View full post
It's normal if you're a slut.
A person who doesn't know the difference between "no" and "know" shouldn't even be considering having sex.
--
sleepingbeauty
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
5
5
-
POM
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
-
shade_ilmaendu
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If a guy had sex after knowing a girl for 2 days...would you call him a whore? It's her body and her choice, I would advise protection as others have done.
And what the hell has spelling got to do with emotional and physical maturity?
--
ZiShu
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Angri04
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Actually yes, I would call that guy a womanizer or manwhore but that's me.
Yes it's her body, but the question is if she should or shouldn't.
Protection if she should but if she wants to have a long loving relationship, she shouldn't with a guy who wants sex immediately.
Spelling is often linked to intelligence, therefore a person who doesn't know the difference between "know" and "no" probably doesn't have the capacity to think coital sexual relationships through.
And I'd call him a manwhore. Promiscuity has nothing to do with sex, if a man or woman sleeps with someone after two days of knowing him he/she is promiscuous or a manwhore/slut.
--
sleepingbeauty
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Who says spelling is linked to intelligence? And since when has common sense had much to do with intelligence? Some of our most famous geniuses have had dyslexia. Ridiculous assumption for anyone to make, plus it could have been a basic mistake if they didn't go back and re-read it.
As for having sex with someone within 2 days of knowing them, that's their choice. Not mine admittedly but still a choice. They may feel very comfortable with that person in a short space of time and have a 'connection'. Or they may not be looking for anything serious, just some fun (as long as they are safe).
Haha that's rights Angela, teach the bastards how to spell :D
While it is perfectly acceptable to have different standards for yourself, to call someone else a slut for choosing to sleep with someone sooner rather than later is not. What is right for you is not right for the rest of the world, or do you believe all people need to have the same moral standards as you do? If so then I beg you to take a step back and consider how boring the world would be if there were no diversity.
Now with that said, being free with your sexuality is not being a slut, for neither a man nor woman. Not everyone holds some belief that sex is some magical thing only shared between people who have been together x amount of time and have done a, b, and c first to prove that theyre not a "slut".
Religion plays a big role in this mindset, and it seems that while people turn away from religion more and more frequently, they still hold on to archaic ideas perpetuated by the very thing they now abhor. Sleeping with someone after 2 days or a week or even a night does not have to correlate with low respect for oneself. If they want to connect in a physical way, then by all means let them.
I do agree that this girl doesnt seem like she should be having sex, but thats kinda beside the point here, as I'm remarking on your judgement of this kind of behavior.