It means that she's not an equal partner in their relationship if he's the boss. Plus she believes her opinions aren't as important as his if his opinions are the only ones that really matter in the end. Plus there's the very belittling opinion of hers: "I am happy to serve him I believe that is a woman's role in life". That's just very unhealthy.
All depends on your point of view. Having a role really doesn't mean any of what you say. A waiter is not less of a man if he is happy to serve.
Equality doesn't mean same. I know our shit schools and media try to tell us it does, but it doesn't make them right.
We can agree to disagree. Statistics on marriage longenvity and hapiness continue to prove O.P is correct. If happiness is the goal, I see nothing wrong with succeeding in attaining it, like they have.
A waiter is a just paid job though, it isn't a mutual intimate relationship. I would have to disagree with you on equality not meaning same, how is it not?
Yeah but in terms of gender equality, it does mean the same. The same rights, the same job opportunities, the same respect, treated with the same attitude, etc.
IIN to have old fashioned views about male and female roles
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I didn't read that. Him being in charge doesn't mean she is less than, it means she has relinquished descision making authority.
--
JellyBeanBandit
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
It means that she's not an equal partner in their relationship if he's the boss. Plus she believes her opinions aren't as important as his if his opinions are the only ones that really matter in the end. Plus there's the very belittling opinion of hers: "I am happy to serve him I believe that is a woman's role in life". That's just very unhealthy.
--
RoseIsabella
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
-
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's a yucky point of view in my opinion. I serve no one.🤗
All depends on your point of view. Having a role really doesn't mean any of what you say. A waiter is not less of a man if he is happy to serve.
Equality doesn't mean same. I know our shit schools and media try to tell us it does, but it doesn't make them right.
We can agree to disagree. Statistics on marriage longenvity and hapiness continue to prove O.P is correct. If happiness is the goal, I see nothing wrong with succeeding in attaining it, like they have.
--
JellyBeanBandit
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
A waiter is a just paid job though, it isn't a mutual intimate relationship. I would have to disagree with you on equality not meaning same, how is it not?
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well a waiter is just as equal as a human being as the president is, yet they are not the same.
--
JellyBeanBandit
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah but in terms of gender equality, it does mean the same. The same rights, the same job opportunities, the same respect, treated with the same attitude, etc.
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
O.P didn't say she didn't have rights, respect, opportunity or ever recieved a bad attitude. You infferred all that yourself.