If it was a simple case of Africa not progressing because of "Whitey" then why was Africa not as advanced as Europeans prior to the slave trade? Your premise is wrong.
So you're telling me that a far less advanced civilization was able to not only enslave those from a superior civilization but also destroy their progression aswell, all while being far less advanced?
I don't think you realize how Alt-Righty that sounds, bro.
Because it was not advanced anymore when europeans came to conquer it. Like Greece or Roma.
I can't teach you all the history of the world here, so just check internet dude.
You seem a bit ignorant.
Iin to be tired of all the white guilt propaganda?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
If it was a simple case of Africa not progressing because of "Whitey" then why was Africa not as advanced as Europeans prior to the slave trade? Your premise is wrong.
--
DIO
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
What are you talking about? Egypt was the most advanced country on the planet when europeans were still figuring out how to do fire.
--
[Old Memory]
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
So you're telling me that a far less advanced civilization was able to not only enslave those from a superior civilization but also destroy their progression aswell, all while being far less advanced?
I don't think you realize how Alt-Righty that sounds, bro.
--
DIO
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Because it was not advanced anymore when europeans came to conquer it. Like Greece or Roma.
I can't teach you all the history of the world here, so just check internet dude.
You seem a bit ignorant.
--
Bazinga
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
European weapons were more advanced. For these type of issues, diplomacy doesn't really matter. Firepower talks.
--
DIO
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Also.