Ask Your Question today
Would you call it Normal to lick Dirty feet, deny it sometimes, getting kicked in the Nuts for that and enjoying the Domination of a Women over you? ( I think on my own that it's not, but I want to read your Point )
It is normal. Being a submissive male can be difficult but it is not a negative thing.
I enjoy the domination of a woman over me during sexually masochistic activities, too, so I can relate to you even if my favourite kinks may be different but they fall under the same category.
To the poll creator / original poster: I want to apologize for participation in a sub-thread which might have gone too far from the original topic and for the fact that I am one of the users who "hijacked" your thread to discuss our issues about "kinky" (see our posts above). I am sorry. I told you I am a submissive guy too, so you will understand that I feel the urge to apologize:))
Let's all just agree that all fetishes are fine, and none of them are normal.
THERE. NOW WE DON'T NEED THIS WEBSITE ANYMORE.
Ok I honestly do not see how you are relating the two? These are two totally different things. I think you should have rephrased this. However to answer your question a foot fetish is not normal. Infact anything other than missionary position and sometimes anal is considered sexually bizarre AKA Kinky. Liking feet is a fetish and wanting to be dominated by a women could go into S&M however in this the majority of Semi is mostly men and the Yuki is mostly women. ( yuki:Bottom)(Semi:Top).
For me "anything other than missionary position and sometimes anal" is not sexually bizarre AKA Kinky. If someone doesn´t do anything more than these two things, I call it "poor performance in bed".
Seriously, I like having sex in missionary position very much but I can´t imagine my life without oral sex, hanjobs, etc. and I don´t think it is kinky or sexually bizzare at all. Well, I have some kinky / bizzare sexual preferences but something like cowgirl sex position is as kinky as having sex in anything other than complete darkness (which means it is not kinky at all).
No auctully. It was defined that is what normal sex is. anything else is bizarre or unesscary.
Whoever defined it this way must suffer from lack of creativity, poor sex drive and was probably sexually inhibitted. And this definition reflects the personal taste of its creator, otherwise while anal and not oral or footjobs or handjobs? What makes anal sex more normal than oral sex?
In textbooks of sexology there is much more plausible definition of sexual normalcy/normality - whatever is done consensually between two or more partners without harming them. This definition sounds better to me but my personal "definition" would be maybe even broader, but not necessarily.
Thanks for your answer but I don´t understand it quite well. Defined by whom? Unnecessary for what?
Liking only a missionary and sometimes anal is not normal in my eyes, or at least maybe it is normal but surely it is not very exciting. Again at least for me. And what about masturbation or homosexual sex - which positions are normal for masturbation? I must confess that I do not masturbate only in missionary position or with occasional anal stimulation, so I must be a super kinky guy...
(Just joking, do not take it as a personal attack. I hope that your post was written in the same joking manner and not seriously)
How ever I do see nothing wrong with kinky and as long as you are not disrespecting the boundrys of the other person. Like if someone is not kinky and does not like to be tied up and gagged than do not forced it otherwise it is assualt.
We all have fetishes, but to me anything that involves feet isn't normal.