Well I don't know if I'd agree entirely with that, although I would say it's in part a response to the villification of white people.
Unless you mean, by genocide, that the more folk from other countries we take in, like refugees, the higher chance of whites becoming a minority in their own countries, then I'd say there is some truth to that but I don't know if genocide is the right term or if it's intentional.
When you go to any public school you're programmed to believe some pretty destructive and baseless things. For example, that becoming a minority in your own country is normal, and not only that, it's a GOOD thing because you're such awful people anyway.
This level of replacement/displacement just doesn't happen outside of actual warfare so just coming to terms with such an unprecedented process is already difficult.
This is an unprecedented process, but it's still obvious to me why the process is unethical.
The human species is not immune to the realities of population dynamics, evolution and statistics. If you have a population of -any- living organism, and that population has a low birth rate and there is a ton of immigration by a foreign species/foreign species variety (in this case, "variety" of human species = race) - then the original population will be significantly reduced or even made extinct. I highly doubt that multiculturalists even know the basics of how biological populations work.
Yet another thing that multiculturalists don't understand is that each species or species variety (eg human race) has the -inherent right- to exist where it evolved on this planet. The emperor penguin 100% has the right to Antarctica. The panda 100% has the right to western China. Introducing non-native species is wrong. The way I see it, letting non-Europeans into Europe in significant numbers violates Europeans' inherent right to exist in their native land. Not only is it completely unethical, it's disturbing how many Europeans think this is OK.
iin that the libs want to destroy all confederate monuments?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Well I don't know if I'd agree entirely with that, although I would say it's in part a response to the villification of white people.
Unless you mean, by genocide, that the more folk from other countries we take in, like refugees, the higher chance of whites becoming a minority in their own countries, then I'd say there is some truth to that but I don't know if genocide is the right term or if it's intentional.
--
EccentricWeird
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's hard to accept but once you take the red pill there's no going back. Sorry fam
--
[Old Memory]
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Why do you think some people take the red pill regarding this topic while others don't?
--
EccentricWeird
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
When you go to any public school you're programmed to believe some pretty destructive and baseless things. For example, that becoming a minority in your own country is normal, and not only that, it's a GOOD thing because you're such awful people anyway.
This level of replacement/displacement just doesn't happen outside of actual warfare so just coming to terms with such an unprecedented process is already difficult.
--
[Old Memory]
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
This is an unprecedented process, but it's still obvious to me why the process is unethical.
The human species is not immune to the realities of population dynamics, evolution and statistics. If you have a population of -any- living organism, and that population has a low birth rate and there is a ton of immigration by a foreign species/foreign species variety (in this case, "variety" of human species = race) - then the original population will be significantly reduced or even made extinct. I highly doubt that multiculturalists even know the basics of how biological populations work.
Yet another thing that multiculturalists don't understand is that each species or species variety (eg human race) has the -inherent right- to exist where it evolved on this planet. The emperor penguin 100% has the right to Antarctica. The panda 100% has the right to western China. Introducing non-native species is wrong. The way I see it, letting non-Europeans into Europe in significant numbers violates Europeans' inherent right to exist in their native land. Not only is it completely unethical, it's disturbing how many Europeans think this is OK.