I'll do the math if you do a bit if reading. Outbreaks killing thousands have happened before.
Anyway, I don't care. It would probably be the best thing to happen to the human race for many millennia. Cutting the population by 2/3 would go a long way towards reversing climate change and pollution. Bring it on.
Killed thousands before? I beg to differ. Since you like to read, click this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ebola_outbreaks
The CDC says it will be a marathon effort to stop the disease this time. You don't need to be worried on your boat with your 19 year old girlfriend, but DolphinAngel should be scared, really really SCARED. (Unless she is the 19 year old girlfriend.)
The CDC, like any other governmental entity, needs money to operate. Without a "marathon effort" they won't get the funds they want, so once again the scare tactics are employed. Relax, unless you are on your way to Africa, I doubt you are in much danger.
I am relaxed. The original question of this post was whether the epidemic will eventually go global. The other contributors have made contrary points using sound logic and causal arguments to that end. You simply ignore the question and use supposition to discredit any view contrary to yours.
You have already stuck your foot in your mouth by supposing that previous outbreaks have exceeded 1000 people. I'm afraid your performance on this post could scarcely get you a passing grade in high school English.
IIN that the African Ebola epidemic will go global.
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I'll do the math if you do a bit if reading. Outbreaks killing thousands have happened before.
Anyway, I don't care. It would probably be the best thing to happen to the human race for many millennia. Cutting the population by 2/3 would go a long way towards reversing climate change and pollution. Bring it on.
--
wistfulmaiden
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Anonymous Post Author
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
green_boogers
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
tell me that when youre left to bury the seeping dead bodies of the people you love (if you actually love anybody that is...
Killed thousands before? I beg to differ. Since you like to read, click this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ebola_outbreaks
The CDC says it will be a marathon effort to stop the disease this time. You don't need to be worried on your boat with your 19 year old girlfriend, but DolphinAngel should be scared, really really SCARED. (Unless she is the 19 year old girlfriend.)
--
thegypsysailor
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
The CDC, like any other governmental entity, needs money to operate. Without a "marathon effort" they won't get the funds they want, so once again the scare tactics are employed. Relax, unless you are on your way to Africa, I doubt you are in much danger.
--
Anonymous Post Author
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I am relaxed. The original question of this post was whether the epidemic will eventually go global. The other contributors have made contrary points using sound logic and causal arguments to that end. You simply ignore the question and use supposition to discredit any view contrary to yours.
You have already stuck your foot in your mouth by supposing that previous outbreaks have exceeded 1000 people. I'm afraid your performance on this post could scarcely get you a passing grade in high school English.
I can only shake my head, go back to school.
Hey, hey, 2/3 fatalities. Good to clean out the riff-raff every couple of centuries. Nice point there, old fellar.
--
[Old Memory]
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
2/3 fatalities eh? Only if the fatalities are other people and not you right? HA!
--
green_boogers
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I would say my chances are one in three. Your chances are probably the same as mine. What do you think?