Yes, cause naming a few species is such irrefutable proof that monogamy is a universally spread character trait. While in typical fashion ignoring the other millions of species who are not monogamous, including Bonobos, who are the most similar to humans.
Humans are a "pair-bonding" species. While I'll grant you that we are not completely genetically programmed for monogamy we are certainty not sex machines rigged to copulate at every chance for proliferation of species. Free love is not the natural state of humanity. If you belive that it is you are flat out wrong. Humans have strong male jealousy and mate guarding tendencies as well as female oxytocin release that drives bonding. You need to read up on the subject before you go spouting off some bullshit you know nothing about.
IIN that I would cheat if he couldn't find out
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Yes, cause naming a few species is such irrefutable proof that monogamy is a universally spread character trait. While in typical fashion ignoring the other millions of species who are not monogamous, including Bonobos, who are the most similar to humans.
--
Jweezee
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
Humans are a "pair-bonding" species. While I'll grant you that we are not completely genetically programmed for monogamy we are certainty not sex machines rigged to copulate at every chance for proliferation of species. Free love is not the natural state of humanity. If you belive that it is you are flat out wrong. Humans have strong male jealousy and mate guarding tendencies as well as female oxytocin release that drives bonding. You need to read up on the subject before you go spouting off some bullshit you know nothing about.