Monogamy restrains normal biological functions. It is a social condition forced upon us by religious nuts and their blind followers.
There is no place for morality in the context of sex and reproduction.
Morality is a foreign concept on the path of evolution.
Therefor it should not be used as a form of inhibition geared at people who only follow their natural instinct.
Everyone who disagrees with this is an imbecile.
Morality is a product of evolution. There's plenty of information on the web to back that up if you're so inclined. Unless of course you side with the religious nuts and their blind followers you admire so much that would claim that it is divinely originated. You better inform the gibbons, albatrosses, swans, bald eagles, beavers, owls, and octopods that they have this whole reproduction thing fucked up and they're not supposed to be monogamous. How unnatural of nature. But I guess you're right, I'm just an imbecile with a biology degree.
Yes, cause naming a few species is such irrefutable proof that monogamy is a universally spread character trait. While in typical fashion ignoring the other millions of species who are not monogamous, including Bonobos, who are the most similar to humans.
Humans are a "pair-bonding" species. While I'll grant you that we are not completely genetically programmed for monogamy we are certainty not sex machines rigged to copulate at every chance for proliferation of species. Free love is not the natural state of humanity. If you belive that it is you are flat out wrong. Humans have strong male jealousy and mate guarding tendencies as well as female oxytocin release that drives bonding. You need to read up on the subject before you go spouting off some bullshit you know nothing about.
Except in this day of common STD's. I'm certainly not a prude, but I'm not interested in getting some STD because my partner had a sex and neglected protection, in the heat of passion.
Everyone who disagrees with this is an imbecile.
Wow ... I PARTLY agree with you for once >.> I WILL however add that if you know that you are unable to be monogamous to a person that expects this STAY SINGLE or be with someone of the same mindset.
People are getting more and more open these days so to find someone willing of having an open relationship wouldn't be that hard.
Unless you are ugly.
IIN that I would cheat if he couldn't find out
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Monogamy restrains normal biological functions. It is a social condition forced upon us by religious nuts and their blind followers.
There is no place for morality in the context of sex and reproduction.
Morality is a foreign concept on the path of evolution.
Therefor it should not be used as a form of inhibition geared at people who only follow their natural instinct.
Everyone who disagrees with this is an imbecile.
--
Jweezee
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
-
thegypsysailor
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
-
Anonymous Post Author
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
(s)aint
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Morality is a product of evolution. There's plenty of information on the web to back that up if you're so inclined. Unless of course you side with the religious nuts and their blind followers you admire so much that would claim that it is divinely originated. You better inform the gibbons, albatrosses, swans, bald eagles, beavers, owls, and octopods that they have this whole reproduction thing fucked up and they're not supposed to be monogamous. How unnatural of nature. But I guess you're right, I'm just an imbecile with a biology degree.
--
Crusades_
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Yes, cause naming a few species is such irrefutable proof that monogamy is a universally spread character trait. While in typical fashion ignoring the other millions of species who are not monogamous, including Bonobos, who are the most similar to humans.
--
Jweezee
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
Humans are a "pair-bonding" species. While I'll grant you that we are not completely genetically programmed for monogamy we are certainty not sex machines rigged to copulate at every chance for proliferation of species. Free love is not the natural state of humanity. If you belive that it is you are flat out wrong. Humans have strong male jealousy and mate guarding tendencies as well as female oxytocin release that drives bonding. You need to read up on the subject before you go spouting off some bullshit you know nothing about.
Except in this day of common STD's. I'm certainly not a prude, but I'm not interested in getting some STD because my partner had a sex and neglected protection, in the heat of passion.
Everyone who disagrees with this is an imbecile.
Are you aware of your Myers-Briggs type?
Wow ... I PARTLY agree with you for once >.> I WILL however add that if you know that you are unable to be monogamous to a person that expects this STAY SINGLE or be with someone of the same mindset.
People are getting more and more open these days so to find someone willing of having an open relationship wouldn't be that hard.
Unless you are ugly.