It's easier to have a orbiting station than a moon base. It's a cost effective solution to study long term gravitational effects there. A moon base would have to have multiple wings thousands of tons of equipment and food and water supplies to the crew not to mention it will be a bitch to get off the moon back towards earth, landing approximately where you want to go. Besides all of thos will take trillions of dollars if we do this right now or a few billion if we progress slowly.
The orbiting station is a sitting duck for flying space debris, and still requires impossible maneuvers to bring food and water to the fake astronauts.
Or think of it this way: Every single video and picture that NASA puts out could be easily faked with existing technology. So there is absolutely no concrete proof that they do anything they say that they're doing. Nobody lies for money!
IIN That I think war is natural
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
It's easier to have a orbiting station than a moon base. It's a cost effective solution to study long term gravitational effects there. A moon base would have to have multiple wings thousands of tons of equipment and food and water supplies to the crew not to mention it will be a bitch to get off the moon back towards earth, landing approximately where you want to go. Besides all of thos will take trillions of dollars if we do this right now or a few billion if we progress slowly.
--
SmokeEverything
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The orbiting station is a sitting duck for flying space debris, and still requires impossible maneuvers to bring food and water to the fake astronauts.
Or think of it this way: Every single video and picture that NASA puts out could be easily faked with existing technology. So there is absolutely no concrete proof that they do anything they say that they're doing. Nobody lies for money!