Why is it stupid? Because it disagrees with lies you've been taught?
Small children think their teachers are brilliant geniuses who know everything until they grow up and realize teachers are just regular people regurgitating information they were taught. The function of government-sponsored education is to make sure dumb children grow up believing what they government wants them to, big suprise. The president reads lines off a teleprompter that were written by somebody else and you think you aren't watching just another fake TV show.
Why would the USSR agree we landed on the moon? They had every single reason not to agree with us but lo and behold they agree we landed on the moon. If we could land on the moon having a semi permanent instillation in space isnt that hard of a leap
Because they're all in collusion in terms of fake space... China had a fake space rover a couple months ago, Elon Musk has fake rockets that land themselves. It's all a gigantic hoax to steal tax money.
Think about this, If they can land on the moon without a computer why would you have a space station instead of a moon base? Why would you have a vulnerable dangerous craft flying at 17,000 MPH when you could have a base on the moon, which the current fake democratically elected fake president is saying that we can go back to the moon even though they "lost" all the technology?
Nobody goes to space and anything you see on TV news just validates the fake things you were taught in school. The same banks that financed the soviets also financed america. The History channel is teaching that aliens built the pyramids in egypt... And you don't see anything wrong with that?
It's easier to have a orbiting station than a moon base. It's a cost effective solution to study long term gravitational effects there. A moon base would have to have multiple wings thousands of tons of equipment and food and water supplies to the crew not to mention it will be a bitch to get off the moon back towards earth, landing approximately where you want to go. Besides all of thos will take trillions of dollars if we do this right now or a few billion if we progress slowly.
The orbiting station is a sitting duck for flying space debris, and still requires impossible maneuvers to bring food and water to the fake astronauts.
Or think of it this way: Every single video and picture that NASA puts out could be easily faked with existing technology. So there is absolutely no concrete proof that they do anything they say that they're doing. Nobody lies for money!
IIN That I think war is natural
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Why is it stupid? Because it disagrees with lies you've been taught?
Small children think their teachers are brilliant geniuses who know everything until they grow up and realize teachers are just regular people regurgitating information they were taught. The function of government-sponsored education is to make sure dumb children grow up believing what they government wants them to, big suprise. The president reads lines off a teleprompter that were written by somebody else and you think you aren't watching just another fake TV show.
--
Anonymous Post Author
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Why would the USSR agree we landed on the moon? They had every single reason not to agree with us but lo and behold they agree we landed on the moon. If we could land on the moon having a semi permanent instillation in space isnt that hard of a leap
--
SmokeEverything
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Because they're all in collusion in terms of fake space... China had a fake space rover a couple months ago, Elon Musk has fake rockets that land themselves. It's all a gigantic hoax to steal tax money.
Think about this, If they can land on the moon without a computer why would you have a space station instead of a moon base? Why would you have a vulnerable dangerous craft flying at 17,000 MPH when you could have a base on the moon, which the current fake democratically elected fake president is saying that we can go back to the moon even though they "lost" all the technology?
Nobody goes to space and anything you see on TV news just validates the fake things you were taught in school. The same banks that financed the soviets also financed america. The History channel is teaching that aliens built the pyramids in egypt... And you don't see anything wrong with that?
--
Anonymous Post Author
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's easier to have a orbiting station than a moon base. It's a cost effective solution to study long term gravitational effects there. A moon base would have to have multiple wings thousands of tons of equipment and food and water supplies to the crew not to mention it will be a bitch to get off the moon back towards earth, landing approximately where you want to go. Besides all of thos will take trillions of dollars if we do this right now or a few billion if we progress slowly.
--
SmokeEverything
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The orbiting station is a sitting duck for flying space debris, and still requires impossible maneuvers to bring food and water to the fake astronauts.
Or think of it this way: Every single video and picture that NASA puts out could be easily faked with existing technology. So there is absolutely no concrete proof that they do anything they say that they're doing. Nobody lies for money!