Wars have been fought for other reasons rather than money. The crusades was about religion, revolutionary war was to overthrow a tyrannical government, WW2 was caused by German nationalism, Cold War was caused by tensions between democratic and communist nations. It's actually not typically about money. Money is most often just a side factor in wars, it's a means to an end.
People are the ultimate resource. Having more members is essential to gain power. While these countries were seperate they all had an alliance with eachother through religion.
WW2 was caused by the displaced monarchies and crooked bankers of europe. The cold war was a complete psyop centered around pseudoscience and hoaxes like "nuclear weapons" (FAKE) and the idea that human beings have the technology to go to space (ALSO FAKE) and the people providing the materials to make weapons make a ton of money. Carnegie steel provided the metal to build the rails to carry people to Auschwitz. All of these are completely unnatural events caused ON PURPOSE by tyrants and crooked financiers. If war was natural animals in nature would go to war.
Why is it stupid? Because it disagrees with lies you've been taught?
Small children think their teachers are brilliant geniuses who know everything until they grow up and realize teachers are just regular people regurgitating information they were taught. The function of government-sponsored education is to make sure dumb children grow up believing what they government wants them to, big suprise. The president reads lines off a teleprompter that were written by somebody else and you think you aren't watching just another fake TV show.
Why would the USSR agree we landed on the moon? They had every single reason not to agree with us but lo and behold they agree we landed on the moon. If we could land on the moon having a semi permanent instillation in space isnt that hard of a leap
Because they're all in collusion in terms of fake space... China had a fake space rover a couple months ago, Elon Musk has fake rockets that land themselves. It's all a gigantic hoax to steal tax money.
Think about this, If they can land on the moon without a computer why would you have a space station instead of a moon base? Why would you have a vulnerable dangerous craft flying at 17,000 MPH when you could have a base on the moon, which the current fake democratically elected fake president is saying that we can go back to the moon even though they "lost" all the technology?
Nobody goes to space and anything you see on TV news just validates the fake things you were taught in school. The same banks that financed the soviets also financed america. The History channel is teaching that aliens built the pyramids in egypt... And you don't see anything wrong with that?
It's easier to have a orbiting station than a moon base. It's a cost effective solution to study long term gravitational effects there. A moon base would have to have multiple wings thousands of tons of equipment and food and water supplies to the crew not to mention it will be a bitch to get off the moon back towards earth, landing approximately where you want to go. Besides all of thos will take trillions of dollars if we do this right now or a few billion if we progress slowly.
I thought you were simply misinformed. Turns out you are either a troll or conspiracy theorist. If you are a conspiracy theorist I don't mind debating you, but I'd rather not deal with trolls.
Not a conspiracy theorist, just done some independent research. If you can actually watch NASAs really crappy space station videos and believe that's actually really happening, or that they couldn't be faking videos like that, you probably also believe Ernie and Bert are real people.
You can literally see the space station from the ground. With the naked eye it looks like just a fast moving ball of light. If you have a strong enough telescope you can see the space station in pretty good detail. You want to see it yourself just buy a telescope for a couple hundred bucks, figure out the flight path, then hope it's a clear night.
Can you see people on there? Can you send me a photo of this that's actually validated by an outside authority because NASA footage is subject to independent analysis as if a skeptic were reviewing what they say that they did? Of course not, you just believe what you see on the screen like a 2nd grader watching sesame street. The space shuttle goes to the neighborhood of make believe from MR rodgers.
"Oh I saw a fast moving ball of light, it must be the space station" Is the same as saying flat earth being stupid proves we went to space. I don't have a couple hundred dollars to spend on a telescope, NASA makes like 53 Million dollars a day to "go to space" so why do I have to prove it to myself? NOBODY INDEPENDENTLY VALIDATES THE CLAIMS THEY MAKE!!!!!
So is anything you can't prove yourself wrong? Are atoms not real because you can't see them without an electron microscope? What about black holes, gravitational waves, any sub-atomic particle, stars, planets, etc. There are so many things that can't be validated by the average person because equipment is expensive. A couple hundred bucks isn't much, relative to other more expensive materials. If a couple hundred bucks is too much for you then make your own telescope, there are tutorials on youtube on how to make relatively powerful telescopes.
You are stupid. And I'm pretty sure you know it yourself.
Your independent research sound like a kid that believes the moon is inhabited by rabbits because he read it on the internet.
Get real. Time to grow up.
And you believe that we went to the moon because of stuff that couldve been done with marionette puppets. I can call you stupid too, you think people hanging from wires in front of a green screen are in space hahahaha
Im grown dog. Im 30 goin on 31 and I smoke like friggin everything. Nobodys saying there are rabbits on the moon, thats a cool ridiculous strawman argument. Nobody went to the moon in the first place to see if there are rabbits there is way easier to (not) prove. Or do you have proof that they went to the moon? I can't find any bud. Not to be mean or anything just please, provide solid proof that your news feed is true so I can stop looking like an insane drug addict.
Or you can grow up too and realize you believe what you were taught without validating it for yourself like a kid believeing in santa claus.
IIN That I think war is natural
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Wars have been fought for other reasons rather than money. The crusades was about religion, revolutionary war was to overthrow a tyrannical government, WW2 was caused by German nationalism, Cold War was caused by tensions between democratic and communist nations. It's actually not typically about money. Money is most often just a side factor in wars, it's a means to an end.
--
Anonymous Post Author
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
SmokeEverything
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
People are the ultimate resource. Having more members is essential to gain power. While these countries were seperate they all had an alliance with eachother through religion.
WW2 was caused by the displaced monarchies and crooked bankers of europe. The cold war was a complete psyop centered around pseudoscience and hoaxes like "nuclear weapons" (FAKE) and the idea that human beings have the technology to go to space (ALSO FAKE) and the people providing the materials to make weapons make a ton of money. Carnegie steel provided the metal to build the rails to carry people to Auschwitz. All of these are completely unnatural events caused ON PURPOSE by tyrants and crooked financiers. If war was natural animals in nature would go to war.
--
Anonymous Post Author
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
xxLucifer
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I dont know if you are trolling because I unfortunately know people this stupid.
--
SmokeEverything
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Why is it stupid? Because it disagrees with lies you've been taught?
Small children think their teachers are brilliant geniuses who know everything until they grow up and realize teachers are just regular people regurgitating information they were taught. The function of government-sponsored education is to make sure dumb children grow up believing what they government wants them to, big suprise. The president reads lines off a teleprompter that were written by somebody else and you think you aren't watching just another fake TV show.
--
Anonymous Post Author
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Why would the USSR agree we landed on the moon? They had every single reason not to agree with us but lo and behold they agree we landed on the moon. If we could land on the moon having a semi permanent instillation in space isnt that hard of a leap
--
SmokeEverything
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Because they're all in collusion in terms of fake space... China had a fake space rover a couple months ago, Elon Musk has fake rockets that land themselves. It's all a gigantic hoax to steal tax money.
Think about this, If they can land on the moon without a computer why would you have a space station instead of a moon base? Why would you have a vulnerable dangerous craft flying at 17,000 MPH when you could have a base on the moon, which the current fake democratically elected fake president is saying that we can go back to the moon even though they "lost" all the technology?
Nobody goes to space and anything you see on TV news just validates the fake things you were taught in school. The same banks that financed the soviets also financed america. The History channel is teaching that aliens built the pyramids in egypt... And you don't see anything wrong with that?
--
Anonymous Post Author
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
It's easier to have a orbiting station than a moon base. It's a cost effective solution to study long term gravitational effects there. A moon base would have to have multiple wings thousands of tons of equipment and food and water supplies to the crew not to mention it will be a bitch to get off the moon back towards earth, landing approximately where you want to go. Besides all of thos will take trillions of dollars if we do this right now or a few billion if we progress slowly.
I thought you were simply misinformed. Turns out you are either a troll or conspiracy theorist. If you are a conspiracy theorist I don't mind debating you, but I'd rather not deal with trolls.
--
SmokeEverything
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Not a conspiracy theorist, just done some independent research. If you can actually watch NASAs really crappy space station videos and believe that's actually really happening, or that they couldn't be faking videos like that, you probably also believe Ernie and Bert are real people.
--
xxLucifer
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
DIO
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You can literally see the space station from the ground. With the naked eye it looks like just a fast moving ball of light. If you have a strong enough telescope you can see the space station in pretty good detail. You want to see it yourself just buy a telescope for a couple hundred bucks, figure out the flight path, then hope it's a clear night.
--
SmokeEverything
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Can you see people on there? Can you send me a photo of this that's actually validated by an outside authority because NASA footage is subject to independent analysis as if a skeptic were reviewing what they say that they did? Of course not, you just believe what you see on the screen like a 2nd grader watching sesame street. The space shuttle goes to the neighborhood of make believe from MR rodgers.
"Oh I saw a fast moving ball of light, it must be the space station" Is the same as saying flat earth being stupid proves we went to space. I don't have a couple hundred dollars to spend on a telescope, NASA makes like 53 Million dollars a day to "go to space" so why do I have to prove it to myself? NOBODY INDEPENDENTLY VALIDATES THE CLAIMS THEY MAKE!!!!!
--
xxLucifer
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
So is anything you can't prove yourself wrong? Are atoms not real because you can't see them without an electron microscope? What about black holes, gravitational waves, any sub-atomic particle, stars, planets, etc. There are so many things that can't be validated by the average person because equipment is expensive. A couple hundred bucks isn't much, relative to other more expensive materials. If a couple hundred bucks is too much for you then make your own telescope, there are tutorials on youtube on how to make relatively powerful telescopes.
You are stupid. And I'm pretty sure you know it yourself.
Your independent research sound like a kid that believes the moon is inhabited by rabbits because he read it on the internet.
Get real. Time to grow up.
--
SmokeEverything
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
And you believe that we went to the moon because of stuff that couldve been done with marionette puppets. I can call you stupid too, you think people hanging from wires in front of a green screen are in space hahahaha
Im grown dog. Im 30 goin on 31 and I smoke like friggin everything. Nobodys saying there are rabbits on the moon, thats a cool ridiculous strawman argument. Nobody went to the moon in the first place to see if there are rabbits there is way easier to (not) prove. Or do you have proof that they went to the moon? I can't find any bud. Not to be mean or anything just please, provide solid proof that your news feed is true so I can stop looking like an insane drug addict.
Or you can grow up too and realize you believe what you were taught without validating it for yourself like a kid believeing in santa claus.
--
DIO
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Well that explain things. You're smoking way too much.
Do you also believe the earth is flat? And that jesus was a reptile?