Right, as someone who has had this arguement many times i need to clarify some points. A fetus is not sentient, until it is born it a parasite. A sybiotic orgasm that lives off the mother. It has no rights, thoughts, feelings or opinions. It is the responsiblility of the mother.
What gives you the right to tell someone else what is acceptable or not. Because some book of ancient fables says that its wrong, right?
Wrong, the two supporting passage that pro-lifers use are "all life is sacred" so i suppose that rules out eating meat, insect spray and anti-bacterial wipes. No of course it doesn't because you can make it mean wahtever you want.
Two is a passage that roughly says "if a man should strike a women and cause her fruit to pass from her then he should surely be put to death". A passage that is at best loosely relevant.
You know what is "intrinstically evil" religion telling people how evil contraecption then condeming them from removing unwanted pregnanies. Face facts it isn't 1432 anymore. We don't have to believe the garbage that priests spout. They are out of touch and irrelevant.
I may be male but i will fight tooth and claw for women's right to choose. Because it will ulitmately effect them and not some church group. Just the same as i fight for legal euthanasia and gay marriage. Outdated pointless dogma that impeeds social progress and degrades society.
So yes it is normal to point just how stupid people are for not considering it.
IIN that i think people sre stupid for not considering abortion?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Right, as someone who has had this arguement many times i need to clarify some points. A fetus is not sentient, until it is born it a parasite. A sybiotic orgasm that lives off the mother. It has no rights, thoughts, feelings or opinions. It is the responsiblility of the mother.
What gives you the right to tell someone else what is acceptable or not. Because some book of ancient fables says that its wrong, right?
Wrong, the two supporting passage that pro-lifers use are "all life is sacred" so i suppose that rules out eating meat, insect spray and anti-bacterial wipes. No of course it doesn't because you can make it mean wahtever you want.
Two is a passage that roughly says "if a man should strike a women and cause her fruit to pass from her then he should surely be put to death". A passage that is at best loosely relevant.
You know what is "intrinstically evil" religion telling people how evil contraecption then condeming them from removing unwanted pregnanies. Face facts it isn't 1432 anymore. We don't have to believe the garbage that priests spout. They are out of touch and irrelevant.
I may be male but i will fight tooth and claw for women's right to choose. Because it will ulitmately effect them and not some church group. Just the same as i fight for legal euthanasia and gay marriage. Outdated pointless dogma that impeeds social progress and degrades society.
So yes it is normal to point just how stupid people are for not considering it.
--
Accjrb
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Violet_Heart
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Reading that just gave me a mind hard-on, a raging brainer.
You've said everything I've thought of without a single profane word and without the use of sarcasm. If I could shake your hand I would.