You don't need a handgun to kill someone in self-defense.
If you insist on having a gun in your home for this purpose, why not a semi-automatic, high powered rifle or a shotgun?
Most criminals have guns you do know that right?
A handgun is sufficient to thwart someone breaking in.
Why shouldn't the innocent citizen be allowed to protect himself and family?
You should move to Chicago where there's tight gun control on the citizens. Do you think the thugs don't know that? Gun crime is much higher there than areas where the innocent can protect themselves.
You gun grabbers are a trip. You only want the criminals to have them until something bad happens to you.
The problem with your thinking is that if you want a handgun to protect yourself, then the criminals also can get handguns. Handguns are relatively easy to hide and transport.
I would outlaw handguns altogether, except for the few people who really need them. Then I would make a simple law where anyone can shoot to kill, or kill in other ways, anyone who is in possession of a handgun. Gun collectors and museums would need to make special precautions for storage, display and transport.
The criminals already have guns and can get them whether legal or not. How do you not understand that? Citizens need them for protection against the gun carrying thugs.
Stop replying to me I'm the only one using logic.
IIN, that I'm EXCITED about Obama's new big gun control crackdown?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
You don't need a handgun to kill someone in self-defense.
If you insist on having a gun in your home for this purpose, why not a semi-automatic, high powered rifle or a shotgun?
--
robbieforgotpw
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Most criminals have guns you do know that right?
A handgun is sufficient to thwart someone breaking in.
Why shouldn't the innocent citizen be allowed to protect himself and family?
You should move to Chicago where there's tight gun control on the citizens. Do you think the thugs don't know that? Gun crime is much higher there than areas where the innocent can protect themselves.
You gun grabbers are a trip. You only want the criminals to have them until something bad happens to you.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The problem with your thinking is that if you want a handgun to protect yourself, then the criminals also can get handguns. Handguns are relatively easy to hide and transport.
I would outlaw handguns altogether, except for the few people who really need them. Then I would make a simple law where anyone can shoot to kill, or kill in other ways, anyone who is in possession of a handgun. Gun collectors and museums would need to make special precautions for storage, display and transport.
--
robbieforgotpw
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
The criminals already have guns and can get them whether legal or not. How do you not understand that? Citizens need them for protection against the gun carrying thugs.
Stop replying to me I'm the only one using logic.