A good rule of thumb is if you don't want to get hit, then don't ever hit anyone.
That usually works.
Why the fuck would anyone be surprised because someone hit you back?
PS- I've never hit a woman, maybe because I just like classy women.
You'd think it's that simple but apparently the idea of "don't start none, won't be none" is lost on people who don't think women are children in this subject.
I'm also pretty sure that the same people using the strength disparity excuse would call you sexist if you played devils advocate in saying that if we are to take strength disparities in to consideration between men and women then a woman should be seen as less qualified compared to men if physical capability is an aspect of the job.
Now that's not my views but people using this tiring excuse that allows a woman to hurt other people then they're going to need reminded that using such an excuse implies so much more in many other aspects of life.
Nevertheless what I said would be considered as sexist to some even though it was their mentality being used.
Basically, atleast to some on here, the standard is that if something is to be gained via sexism for women, it's ok...if it harms women then it's not ok, even if the standard being used to harm women through sexism is their own.
IIN That A Real Man Won't Hit A Woman Back?
← View full post
A good rule of thumb is if you don't want to get hit, then don't ever hit anyone.
That usually works.
Why the fuck would anyone be surprised because someone hit you back?
PS- I've never hit a woman, maybe because I just like classy women.
--
Anonymous Post Author
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
[Old Memory]
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Excellent reply.
You'd think it's that simple but apparently the idea of "don't start none, won't be none" is lost on people who don't think women are children in this subject.
I'm also pretty sure that the same people using the strength disparity excuse would call you sexist if you played devils advocate in saying that if we are to take strength disparities in to consideration between men and women then a woman should be seen as less qualified compared to men if physical capability is an aspect of the job.
Now that's not my views but people using this tiring excuse that allows a woman to hurt other people then they're going to need reminded that using such an excuse implies so much more in many other aspects of life.
Nevertheless what I said would be considered as sexist to some even though it was their mentality being used.
Basically, atleast to some on here, the standard is that if something is to be gained via sexism for women, it's ok...if it harms women then it's not ok, even if the standard being used to harm women through sexism is their own.