I was referring to the "ur". And I should have added in grammar. It also lacks punctuation at the end.
The reason ur is wrong (aside form obvious reasons), because he was using it as you're or you are. You see ur is short for your. Now u r is short for you are. So that was my issue with that.
Well it's more a case of 'ur' lacking an apostrophe isn't it? Like u'r or u're. But I retract that statement anyway...
Mainly because 'ur' is an informal phonetic abbreviation, there's no point either of us applying standard English language rules to something which is non-standard txt-speak.
I mean, in a world where 2 can mean to, too or 1+1, ur can mean your or you're.
IIN not to want to ever grow up? What age would you like to be?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I was referring to the "ur". And I should have added in grammar. It also lacks punctuation at the end.
The reason ur is wrong (aside form obvious reasons), because he was using it as you're or you are. You see ur is short for your. Now u r is short for you are. So that was my issue with that.
--
disthing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ha OK... That's punctuation rather than spelling, but I don't know why I bothered correcting I was just being pedantic - and I was bored.
--
anti-hero
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
ur vs. u r is not punctuation.
--
disthing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well it's more a case of 'ur' lacking an apostrophe isn't it? Like u'r or u're. But I retract that statement anyway...
Mainly because 'ur' is an informal phonetic abbreviation, there's no point either of us applying standard English language rules to something which is non-standard txt-speak.
I mean, in a world where 2 can mean to, too or 1+1, ur can mean your or you're.
Anyway...