I feel a downvote incoming anyway, so I'll just continue: The idea that women are incapable of violating a child just because they don't have a penis is ridiculous. A flaccid penis is not a "weapon", unless you're saying that men naturally get aroused while cleaning their own children. Something that I guess would never happen if he was female because, what, women are too pure and innocent for that?
The idea that I would somehow remain unviolated after an unwanted encounter in a shower just because the person assaulting me was my mother instead of my father is just such utter bullshit.
IIN my mom would take us in with her to shower when we were toddlers?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
They have hands...
I feel a downvote incoming anyway, so I'll just continue: The idea that women are incapable of violating a child just because they don't have a penis is ridiculous. A flaccid penis is not a "weapon", unless you're saying that men naturally get aroused while cleaning their own children. Something that I guess would never happen if he was female because, what, women are too pure and innocent for that?
The idea that I would somehow remain unviolated after an unwanted encounter in a shower just because the person assaulting me was my mother instead of my father is just such utter bullshit.
--
HOH66
11 months ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Tinybird
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If a woman is ok being naked with her kids, thats her decision.
Hands are not genitals or sexual organs.