Society wasn't "more functional" for women "back then". Domestic violence was ignored, contraceptives were unreliable so women had far more children than they wanted and women were financially dependant upon men and couldn't enter most well paid professions.
Who is trying to make men into women and women into men? I'd love to see some scientific evidence that the sexes have inherent abilities for different jobs: that is total rubbish. Where have you been for the last 50 years?
I don’t condone violence, domestic or otherwise, but if you think this modern world of equality we now live in means the end of domestic violence you are clearly living on a different planet to the rest of us. That said I do believe in moderate corporal punishment provided it is justified and not used as a cover for abuse.
Those are two examples off the top of my head where you have male-dominated jobs that are having the standards lowered to allow females in. I'm very surprised you don't know that there are biological differences between men and women and that it obviously translates to different capabilities to do certain work. I'm also sure there are many more examples you could find, if you're truly being objective and want to look for yourself. I know there are also scholarships for women who go into certain male-dominated careers as well, purely because they're women.
And, yes, it was far more functional. Western society is failing to even complete the most basic evolutionary functions such as reproduction. Also, I just completely disagree that "Society wasn't "more functional" for women "back then", as does half a century of statistical evidence.
https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Stevenson_ParadoxDecliningFemaleHappiness_Dec08.pdf
It's well known that women's happiness has been falling for about 50 years. Where have I been for the last 50 years? Not pushing for movements that have consistently made women's lives more miserable. It's rather ironic, as that study, "The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness" says in the title, but these movements that are supposedly for "equality", by modern and recent feminists, have made women consistently unhappier for decades.
It only seems to be the nutty feminists who refuse to look at the evidence. It's out there and plain to see. I hope you genuinely are interested in it, and not one of them, because it's in abundance and is objectively damning of what the feminists have been and continue to push for, not only in regards to the most basic functions to keep a society living from generation to generation, but it's crushed the happiness for the group of people they're supposedly fighting for as well; Feminism has become the monster it was created to fight, and it has been for a long time.
IIN I think we should bring back old fashion values
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Society wasn't "more functional" for women "back then". Domestic violence was ignored, contraceptives were unreliable so women had far more children than they wanted and women were financially dependant upon men and couldn't enter most well paid professions.
Who is trying to make men into women and women into men? I'd love to see some scientific evidence that the sexes have inherent abilities for different jobs: that is total rubbish. Where have you been for the last 50 years?
--
Anonymous Post Author
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
bigbudchonga
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
I don’t condone violence, domestic or otherwise, but if you think this modern world of equality we now live in means the end of domestic violence you are clearly living on a different planet to the rest of us. That said I do believe in moderate corporal punishment provided it is justified and not used as a cover for abuse.
"Who is trying to make men into women and women into men?"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1375381/Fire-service-strength-fitness-tests-relaxed-allow-women-firefighters.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6585341/Woman-failed-infant-test-given-pass-Army-furious-male-soldiers-staged-rebellion.html
Those are two examples off the top of my head where you have male-dominated jobs that are having the standards lowered to allow females in. I'm very surprised you don't know that there are biological differences between men and women and that it obviously translates to different capabilities to do certain work. I'm also sure there are many more examples you could find, if you're truly being objective and want to look for yourself. I know there are also scholarships for women who go into certain male-dominated careers as well, purely because they're women.
And, yes, it was far more functional. Western society is failing to even complete the most basic evolutionary functions such as reproduction. Also, I just completely disagree that "Society wasn't "more functional" for women "back then", as does half a century of statistical evidence.
https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Stevenson_ParadoxDecliningFemaleHappiness_Dec08.pdf
It's well known that women's happiness has been falling for about 50 years. Where have I been for the last 50 years? Not pushing for movements that have consistently made women's lives more miserable. It's rather ironic, as that study, "The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness" says in the title, but these movements that are supposedly for "equality", by modern and recent feminists, have made women consistently unhappier for decades.
It only seems to be the nutty feminists who refuse to look at the evidence. It's out there and plain to see. I hope you genuinely are interested in it, and not one of them, because it's in abundance and is objectively damning of what the feminists have been and continue to push for, not only in regards to the most basic functions to keep a society living from generation to generation, but it's crushed the happiness for the group of people they're supposedly fighting for as well; Feminism has become the monster it was created to fight, and it has been for a long time.