yeah ofcourse, I assumed that the guy at least made some profit, how else would he be able to afford to purchase property without any other form of income. If the situation would in fact involve the guy using all his product without realizing any financial gain he would not be anything but a junkie and being involved with him would be a complete fail to begin with.
if this situation involved hard-drugs he would be a junkie, but because it involves weed you consider him a pothead. Fact is that even though a pothead sounds much more acceptable it does make people just as useless. BAM
IIN I think I already know the answer......
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
yeah ofcourse, I assumed that the guy at least made some profit, how else would he be able to afford to purchase property without any other form of income. If the situation would in fact involve the guy using all his product without realizing any financial gain he would not be anything but a junkie and being involved with him would be a complete fail to begin with.
--
myboyfriendsbitch
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Well i wouldn't call him a junkie. Lol. Just a pothead.
--
plum6
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
if this situation involved hard-drugs he would be a junkie, but because it involves weed you consider him a pothead. Fact is that even though a pothead sounds much more acceptable it does make people just as useless. BAM
--
myboyfriendsbitch
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
But not as harmful. BAM...like a meth lab.
--
plum6
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
A person who is mentally dependant on weed would not be any more of an addition to society than an meth-head.. BAHAM