I have to agree, especially with the whole feminist part.
I mean, just look at the whole "Twitter" thing going on. They are trying to say that women are the only ones that suffer from trolling and threats online, trying to imply that women are the majority, if not the only ones targeted by troll and threatening comments, regardless of the fact that people everywhere on the internet or mainstream has this happening to them, specifically males.
I mean, although I myself do not like him, just look at Justin Bieber. He must be the person to have the largest amount of troll of violence based statements made against him ever, and the same extents to all sorts of males today, such as One direction, and so on. Yet, articles mention none of this, they simply want to stop trolls from targeting "women" as if targeting men is not a problem, and by isolating men from this it's saying it's less of a problem targeting males as it is females.
Then due to this, the Twitter maker (or whatever) makes a statement apologizing strictly to the "females" of this, rather that "everyone" that has to deal with it, and then they want to say they are for equality when they are doing everything they can to focus attention on female victims, all while excluding the other half of the victims just because they are male?
What I don't agree on is the women in the front lines part you state.
That in itself is sexism. It's as if you are implying a woman going through the same horrors men can go through makes women more deserving of sympathy, as if the male life is less.
I don't agree with that.
As for women going in to those positions, I do believe women should be given the choice to go in to it if they choose to and can pass the test. The problem with this, though, is that people are trying to make the standards lower for women to get in to these positions that men have to work harder to get in to, which again, is not equality.
If a woman can do the same things as men for a certain position, passing the same standards men have to pass to get in to that position, then I think they should be allowed.
Again, they should also have to sign up for selective services, just like men have to, or they should make it men shouldn't.
What I find annoying aswell is how we are "still" trying to convince more women to go in to education even when society has forgotten about males in this aspect, and as a result, men are less likely to attend education, more likely to drop out, and so on.
When will society start trying to motivate men in to education?
I do believe in the future people are just going to have enough, and it won't be a pretty sight.
The reason for all this is the fact that women are very different from men. Women tend to react as a group, they are more outspoken and have more activists, whereas men seem to treat every situation with superficiality and lack of interest. When something affects men, they tend to ignore the problem, by brushing it off and trying to prove their manliness, living up to society's expectation that men should be tough. That they shouldn't complain or whine , which would make them look like cry babies. So, if something affects men in general, they tend to ignore the issue,not making a big fuss about it, hoping it will go away by itself. This is what is wrong with men. They seem to not take anything seriously. Feminist ideology prevails in this conditions,unfortunately.
That could be used as a point if there hasn't been evidence of men speaking out on this and not brushing it off by using means such as speeches to spread the word, or post pictures to spread male victimization, only to have feminists target these speeches, breaking the law to prevent the speech from happening, and tearing down male victim awareness posters.
When men do come out about these issues, the group "claiming" to be about equality does everything to prevent it from happening, and nothing is done about it.
The reason why men try to brush it off is because they know that if they attempt to gain help, they risk ridicule, not being taken seriously, or not even seeing justice.
I have no idea if you intended that as a compliment or an insult, but I am an avid viewer of him, and I do like a lot of his points, so much so to be considered a fan.
So, thanks, I guess? Not sure if you intended it as a compliment or insult.
Ah, then thank you. I was a bit iffy on if it was a compliment or insult. Everyone has fans and people that aren't so much fans, to put it lightly, and TAA is not one to support feminism, and given that, saying a feminist would most likely not find him to be a smart person, so when they say it they would intend on it being an insult.
A fan saying that you remind me of TAA would mean that they obviously mean it as a compliment.
I just wasn't too sure, because it really depends on who the sentence comes from and if they support them or not.
I doubt I am as smart as him, but I am flattered that I remind you of someone like TAA.
IIN I'm Tired of 'Equal Opportunity' and Reverse Discrimination
← View full post
I have to agree, especially with the whole feminist part.
I mean, just look at the whole "Twitter" thing going on. They are trying to say that women are the only ones that suffer from trolling and threats online, trying to imply that women are the majority, if not the only ones targeted by troll and threatening comments, regardless of the fact that people everywhere on the internet or mainstream has this happening to them, specifically males.
I mean, although I myself do not like him, just look at Justin Bieber. He must be the person to have the largest amount of troll of violence based statements made against him ever, and the same extents to all sorts of males today, such as One direction, and so on. Yet, articles mention none of this, they simply want to stop trolls from targeting "women" as if targeting men is not a problem, and by isolating men from this it's saying it's less of a problem targeting males as it is females.
Then due to this, the Twitter maker (or whatever) makes a statement apologizing strictly to the "females" of this, rather that "everyone" that has to deal with it, and then they want to say they are for equality when they are doing everything they can to focus attention on female victims, all while excluding the other half of the victims just because they are male?
What I don't agree on is the women in the front lines part you state.
That in itself is sexism. It's as if you are implying a woman going through the same horrors men can go through makes women more deserving of sympathy, as if the male life is less.
I don't agree with that.
As for women going in to those positions, I do believe women should be given the choice to go in to it if they choose to and can pass the test. The problem with this, though, is that people are trying to make the standards lower for women to get in to these positions that men have to work harder to get in to, which again, is not equality.
If a woman can do the same things as men for a certain position, passing the same standards men have to pass to get in to that position, then I think they should be allowed.
Again, they should also have to sign up for selective services, just like men have to, or they should make it men shouldn't.
What I find annoying aswell is how we are "still" trying to convince more women to go in to education even when society has forgotten about males in this aspect, and as a result, men are less likely to attend education, more likely to drop out, and so on.
When will society start trying to motivate men in to education?
I do believe in the future people are just going to have enough, and it won't be a pretty sight.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
The reason for all this is the fact that women are very different from men. Women tend to react as a group, they are more outspoken and have more activists, whereas men seem to treat every situation with superficiality and lack of interest. When something affects men, they tend to ignore the problem, by brushing it off and trying to prove their manliness, living up to society's expectation that men should be tough. That they shouldn't complain or whine , which would make them look like cry babies. So, if something affects men in general, they tend to ignore the issue,not making a big fuss about it, hoping it will go away by itself. This is what is wrong with men. They seem to not take anything seriously. Feminist ideology prevails in this conditions,unfortunately.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That could be used as a point if there hasn't been evidence of men speaking out on this and not brushing it off by using means such as speeches to spread the word, or post pictures to spread male victimization, only to have feminists target these speeches, breaking the law to prevent the speech from happening, and tearing down male victim awareness posters.
When men do come out about these issues, the group "claiming" to be about equality does everything to prevent it from happening, and nothing is done about it.
The reason why men try to brush it off is because they know that if they attempt to gain help, they risk ridicule, not being taken seriously, or not even seeing justice.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You remind me of the Amazing Atheist.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I have no idea if you intended that as a compliment or an insult, but I am an avid viewer of him, and I do like a lot of his points, so much so to be considered a fan.
So, thanks, I guess? Not sure if you intended it as a compliment or insult.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Why would it be an insult? That guy is a genius.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ah, then thank you. I was a bit iffy on if it was a compliment or insult. Everyone has fans and people that aren't so much fans, to put it lightly, and TAA is not one to support feminism, and given that, saying a feminist would most likely not find him to be a smart person, so when they say it they would intend on it being an insult.
A fan saying that you remind me of TAA would mean that they obviously mean it as a compliment.
I just wasn't too sure, because it really depends on who the sentence comes from and if they support them or not.
I doubt I am as smart as him, but I am flattered that I remind you of someone like TAA.
Thanks.