What? I asked if you were sure you never said "the sex of the users on this page", which is also "right up there".
I responded because you were being unclear and contradicting yourself.
My mistake. I took a second look and I did say that once. Misspoke. However you seemed to have overlooked that the sentence prior is in regard to the website and a whole, as is the numerous other times I mentioned it, including my initial point.
If me mentioning numerous times that I'm talking about the entire site but messed up with one wordd and it threw you off then ok, I apologize.
Its not a contradiction to my actual point.
So, to be more exact for you. She does not know the sex of most people on this website.
That's all I was asking, sheesh. And she could have been speaking more hyperbolically? Not sure, but that's how I took it. "most" the users she has seen here are that way, so that is her observation. Why would one's observation be based on anything else?
Well I don't doubt she's observed it, I've seen them too and don't approve of them but to say they're the vast majority is quite absurd, hence why I just said she doesn't know everyone on this site to make such statements with validity.
I agree that you believe in things based on your own observations however there could be the case of exaggeration and ofcourse that she hasn't chatted to most people who use the site.
If she said that there seems to be a lot more of those types now or that since a lot of regulars left the bad ones are more noticed, I could see that as fair. Lol.
IIN for a man to get along better with women?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
"No I didn't"...are you sure about that?
If you didn't care about her beliefs then why did you start this argument? 🤔
--
[Old Memory]
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yup. It's right up there, numerous times.
If you didn't care about my beliefs then why did you respond to me?
--
FakeAccount1
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
What? I asked if you were sure you never said "the sex of the users on this page", which is also "right up there".
I responded because you were being unclear and contradicting yourself.
--
[Old Memory]
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
My mistake. I took a second look and I did say that once. Misspoke. However you seemed to have overlooked that the sentence prior is in regard to the website and a whole, as is the numerous other times I mentioned it, including my initial point.
If me mentioning numerous times that I'm talking about the entire site but messed up with one wordd and it threw you off then ok, I apologize.
Its not a contradiction to my actual point.
So, to be more exact for you. She does not know the sex of most people on this website.
--
FakeAccount1
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That's all I was asking, sheesh. And she could have been speaking more hyperbolically? Not sure, but that's how I took it. "most" the users she has seen here are that way, so that is her observation. Why would one's observation be based on anything else?
--
[Old Memory]
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Alrighty, no problem.
Well I don't doubt she's observed it, I've seen them too and don't approve of them but to say they're the vast majority is quite absurd, hence why I just said she doesn't know everyone on this site to make such statements with validity.
I agree that you believe in things based on your own observations however there could be the case of exaggeration and ofcourse that she hasn't chatted to most people who use the site.
If she said that there seems to be a lot more of those types now or that since a lot of regulars left the bad ones are more noticed, I could see that as fair. Lol.