No it really isn't. Space is actually any given point anywhere that is absent of any physical presence. It's right infront of your nose, not just beyond the earths atmosphere. THAT IS BASIC PHYSICS.
And astro physics is not basic in the slightest, that's why there is no "fact" yet. The greatest minds have never been able to reach anything conclusive. It's the most complex form of study within physics that exists.
You know what "theory" means, stop confusing it with "fact".
You're confusing different meanings of the word space. In relation to space-time, space has to be occupied with some form of energy (or matter) or else it would be classed as an empty space which doesn't exist except only as a theory. As far as there not being a physical presence in front of my nose, what about air?
Space is anything not occupied by a solid or liquid, it's that simple.
In each reply all you do is explain the logistics of the theory, something I'm already well aware of. What I'm trying to say is that it is only a theory, and thus it is not a fact that time had a specific point of "creation".
It's only an idea, an idea that I'm well aware of and don't need explained.
If you could go back to another time period, what would it be?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
No it really isn't. Space is actually any given point anywhere that is absent of any physical presence. It's right infront of your nose, not just beyond the earths atmosphere. THAT IS BASIC PHYSICS.
And astro physics is not basic in the slightest, that's why there is no "fact" yet. The greatest minds have never been able to reach anything conclusive. It's the most complex form of study within physics that exists.
You know what "theory" means, stop confusing it with "fact".
--
Darkoil
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You're confusing different meanings of the word space. In relation to space-time, space has to be occupied with some form of energy (or matter) or else it would be classed as an empty space which doesn't exist except only as a theory. As far as there not being a physical presence in front of my nose, what about air?
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Space is anything not occupied by a solid or liquid, it's that simple.
In each reply all you do is explain the logistics of the theory, something I'm already well aware of. What I'm trying to say is that it is only a theory, and thus it is not a fact that time had a specific point of "creation".
It's only an idea, an idea that I'm well aware of and don't need explained.