The title question you ask is completely different from the text of your post. At first you ask if a wild animal should be killed if it kills someone. Then your post goes on to explain that the killing of these wild animals should be done as a preventive measure. So what are you asking? You present two questions here. Very confusing. I vote you delete this post and rewrite it. Get it together why don't you. :-(
If someone is killed by a wild animal should it be killed
← View full post
The title question you ask is completely different from the text of your post. At first you ask if a wild animal should be killed if it kills someone. Then your post goes on to explain that the killing of these wild animals should be done as a preventive measure. So what are you asking? You present two questions here. Very confusing. I vote you delete this post and rewrite it. Get it together why don't you. :-(
--
LittleGirlRapedAndSodomised#S2
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah, but it was kinda funny. I voted "Teach it a lesson"
When someone does this next time think of the op like this...
"If someone is killed by a wild animal should it be killed?"
(YES) -disregard- we have to teach it a lesson -disregard-
(NO) -disregard- its a wild animal doing what it -disregard-