The theory of evolution is still a theory, but there is a lot of evidence supporting it. There might be evidence contradicting it in the future, or an alternative theory that is more substantiated.
You're not saying the story of Noah's Ark is a theory, you're saying it's fact, and there is no evidence I have seen that supports the story.
Please show me the evidence you are so confident proves the story of Noah's Arc. If it's good, if it's valid and reliable, I'll agree with you. If it simply points to a thousand possibilities, I won't agree with you.
I don't believe there is proof of Noah's Ark, just like I don't believe there is proof of evolution. I'm just giving you evolutionists a taste of your own medicine.
"Of all of the things in the Bible, you just picked the one incident that has actually been proven to be true."
"The ark was found. Mass extinction. And old sea animal remains being found where bodies of water have never been."
Your words. You said the ark was found? You said it has been proven to be true?
I wouldn't consider myself an evolutionist. I think, of all the theories put forth, the theory of evolution is currently the most plausible, based on the fossil record and genetics. However I'm open to other ideas.
I don't see how you've 'given evolutionists a taste of their own medicine' with your statements :/
Because every time I point out the flaws in the claims of people who try to defend evolution like it's a known scientific fact, they usually ridicule me and then state their "evidence" which is merely things that can make sense in theory, but there is no evidence to confirm it. So I gave them a taste of their own medicine to see how they'd respond, and my hypothesis was correct. They pointed out that it is just a theory, which could very well be true, but hasn't been confirmed as fact. Just like I do to them, but in THEIR case, a theory might as well be concrete evidence.
So in conclusion to this study, evolutionists are hypocrites. You may contact me if you want a copy of the lab report.
But most sensible people know what the word 'theory' means. It's an idea or series of ideas suggested as a possible explanation for something. Like the big bang theory, for example.
Most sensible people know that a theory that isn't proven to be fact remains a theory. It might make a lot of sense, and be the most evidence-supported theory out there, but that doesn't itself prove it to be true.
All you did was lie, to prompt ordinary people like me to challenge your lies. You haven't changed anything with your little show. You haven't undermined anyone or changed anything.
I like to think of myself as one of the most sensible people around. And I've looked at the "evidence" for evolution, and though I can see how it would make sense to someone who doesn't believe in God, and it would be the only plausible explanation. It doesn't make sense to me whatsoever as far as it being more plausible goes, because my sensible mind can still easily point out the thousand of other possibilities of what their "evidence" actually is.
I don't tell people that I know for a fact that Creation is real, and I don't mind if other people THINK that evolution is true. But what bothers me is when evolutionists have the audacity to ridicule me and seem to know for a fact that it is true, even though there isn't any more evidence to prove Evolution than there is to prove Creation.
If God Created Satan is he perfect ?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
'You people'?
The theory of evolution is still a theory, but there is a lot of evidence supporting it. There might be evidence contradicting it in the future, or an alternative theory that is more substantiated.
You're not saying the story of Noah's Ark is a theory, you're saying it's fact, and there is no evidence I have seen that supports the story.
Please show me the evidence you are so confident proves the story of Noah's Arc. If it's good, if it's valid and reliable, I'll agree with you. If it simply points to a thousand possibilities, I won't agree with you.
--
davesumba
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
I don't believe there is proof of Noah's Ark, just like I don't believe there is proof of evolution. I'm just giving you evolutionists a taste of your own medicine.
--
disthing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
What?
"Of all of the things in the Bible, you just picked the one incident that has actually been proven to be true."
"The ark was found. Mass extinction. And old sea animal remains being found where bodies of water have never been."
Your words. You said the ark was found? You said it has been proven to be true?
I wouldn't consider myself an evolutionist. I think, of all the theories put forth, the theory of evolution is currently the most plausible, based on the fossil record and genetics. However I'm open to other ideas.
I don't see how you've 'given evolutionists a taste of their own medicine' with your statements :/
--
davesumba
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Because every time I point out the flaws in the claims of people who try to defend evolution like it's a known scientific fact, they usually ridicule me and then state their "evidence" which is merely things that can make sense in theory, but there is no evidence to confirm it. So I gave them a taste of their own medicine to see how they'd respond, and my hypothesis was correct. They pointed out that it is just a theory, which could very well be true, but hasn't been confirmed as fact. Just like I do to them, but in THEIR case, a theory might as well be concrete evidence.
So in conclusion to this study, evolutionists are hypocrites. You may contact me if you want a copy of the lab report.
--
disthing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I see..
But most sensible people know what the word 'theory' means. It's an idea or series of ideas suggested as a possible explanation for something. Like the big bang theory, for example.
Most sensible people know that a theory that isn't proven to be fact remains a theory. It might make a lot of sense, and be the most evidence-supported theory out there, but that doesn't itself prove it to be true.
All you did was lie, to prompt ordinary people like me to challenge your lies. You haven't changed anything with your little show. You haven't undermined anyone or changed anything.
--
davesumba
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I like to think of myself as one of the most sensible people around. And I've looked at the "evidence" for evolution, and though I can see how it would make sense to someone who doesn't believe in God, and it would be the only plausible explanation. It doesn't make sense to me whatsoever as far as it being more plausible goes, because my sensible mind can still easily point out the thousand of other possibilities of what their "evidence" actually is.
I don't tell people that I know for a fact that Creation is real, and I don't mind if other people THINK that evolution is true. But what bothers me is when evolutionists have the audacity to ridicule me and seem to know for a fact that it is true, even though there isn't any more evidence to prove Evolution than there is to prove Creation.
--
disthing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ok.
You could have simply said so, without the amateur dramatics.