If cancer spreaded into your body and you have more affected cells than unaffected cells, this doesn't mean it's ok because the majority of your cells are conquered by cancer and you might die very soon. Just because many people wear glasses, it doesn't mean it's not anomalous anymore, or that you should have defective eyes because statistically many people suffer from this. The fact that many people (or even a majority) does something doesn't tell you anything about the nature of the habit, as these are independent.
That's a faulty analogy; comparing a fatal disease to something you can derive pleasure from. Additionally, the question was not as to whether or not the desire was normal, as i understand it to be atypical, but rather as to whether or not a person would enjoy it.
In other words, i hope your dick gets caught in the toaster. Good day.
Yeah, totally mentally healthy to wish this, just like your desire to act like a woman. And then you're asking if you're normal...it's pretty obvious you're not, and neither is what you want to do.
"I understand it to be atypical" translates to "I know it's not normal"
"the question was... whether or not a person would enjoy it" translates to "What i'm asking is if the reader would enjoy what I've described."
Again, although the source of the pleasure isn't normal, it IS normal for a person to desire what brings them pleasure. Comparing that desire to cancer is logically faulty and intellectually dishonest.
I wasn't comparing the habit with cancer. I was just comparing the fact that a majority of items in a set being in a state doesn't change the nature of that state. That had nothing to do with cross-dressing or anything in the post. Cancer is lethal, cross-dressing is gay. Radically different, this comparison makes no sense.
I want to wear a dress..
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
If cancer spreaded into your body and you have more affected cells than unaffected cells, this doesn't mean it's ok because the majority of your cells are conquered by cancer and you might die very soon. Just because many people wear glasses, it doesn't mean it's not anomalous anymore, or that you should have defective eyes because statistically many people suffer from this. The fact that many people (or even a majority) does something doesn't tell you anything about the nature of the habit, as these are independent.
--
Anonymous Post Author
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
That's a faulty analogy; comparing a fatal disease to something you can derive pleasure from. Additionally, the question was not as to whether or not the desire was normal, as i understand it to be atypical, but rather as to whether or not a person would enjoy it.
In other words, i hope your dick gets caught in the toaster. Good day.
--
[Old Memory]
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah, totally mentally healthy to wish this, just like your desire to act like a woman. And then you're asking if you're normal...it's pretty obvious you're not, and neither is what you want to do.
--
Anonymous Post Author
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"I understand it to be atypical" translates to "I know it's not normal"
"the question was... whether or not a person would enjoy it" translates to "What i'm asking is if the reader would enjoy what I've described."
Again, although the source of the pleasure isn't normal, it IS normal for a person to desire what brings them pleasure. Comparing that desire to cancer is logically faulty and intellectually dishonest.
--
[Old Memory]
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I wasn't comparing the habit with cancer. I was just comparing the fact that a majority of items in a set being in a state doesn't change the nature of that state. That had nothing to do with cross-dressing or anything in the post. Cancer is lethal, cross-dressing is gay. Radically different, this comparison makes no sense.
--
Anonymous Post Author
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ok fine... That makes much more sense.