All you know is that he's shy. That's it. So for you to throw the word rape around is absolutely ridiculous. This is not a human rights case. This is a guy who can't respond sexually or romantically to a girl because maybe they're both young and he's not matured yet, or he's just bad at it. She said I've asked him out several times. If he's got half a brain and feels like he is being harassed he can say no.
YOU don't know his reasons for not responding. You also don't seem to understand that people don't say no for various reasons - intimidation, politeness, fear if retribution, whatever.
I am merely applying YOUR principles to similar cases. If gender was reversed, if it was a woman receiving unwanted attention, then would you say the same? She should just say no? Or should the person harassing her take note of the obvious physical signs she's not interested, and back the fuck off?
How is getting red an obvious physical sign. It's an obvious physical sign that he's embarrassed we just don't know what for.
Okay lets pretend this guy is a 4'6 pipsqueak with no social status and all he has to his name is his face. He should still learn how to fucking say no. Case and point.
And you can stop using the gender arguement because it doesn't apply and it's not really fair to women either. Girls are abused way more than guys are, at least physically. So yes, it would be different if he were a girl.
I wanna sleep with a virgin
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
All you know is that he's shy. That's it. So for you to throw the word rape around is absolutely ridiculous. This is not a human rights case. This is a guy who can't respond sexually or romantically to a girl because maybe they're both young and he's not matured yet, or he's just bad at it. She said I've asked him out several times. If he's got half a brain and feels like he is being harassed he can say no.
--
charli.m
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
YOU don't know his reasons for not responding. You also don't seem to understand that people don't say no for various reasons - intimidation, politeness, fear if retribution, whatever.
I am merely applying YOUR principles to similar cases. If gender was reversed, if it was a woman receiving unwanted attention, then would you say the same? She should just say no? Or should the person harassing her take note of the obvious physical signs she's not interested, and back the fuck off?
--
Short4Words
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
How is getting red an obvious physical sign. It's an obvious physical sign that he's embarrassed we just don't know what for.
Okay lets pretend this guy is a 4'6 pipsqueak with no social status and all he has to his name is his face. He should still learn how to fucking say no. Case and point.
And you can stop using the gender arguement because it doesn't apply and it's not really fair to women either. Girls are abused way more than guys are, at least physically. So yes, it would be different if he were a girl.
--
charli.m
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Why do I suspect this is more about your own insecurities with women?
Squirming away sounds pretty fuckin obvious to me.
Assault or harrassment are not ok regardless of gender.
--
Short4Words
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Assault no. Harrassment maybe. Like I said we don't know.
--
charli.m
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Harrassment is maybe ok? I really hope you just worded that poorly.
I'll assume that you really were saying this is harrassment, not assault. Fuckin duh. Until she escalates it.
--
Short4Words
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
How's the weather in Australia?