And if you're blessed with a happy relationship why should the onus be on the have-nots to 'suck it up' rather than on the haves to show understanding? What is an annoying little complaint for you is for them, the closest substitute for satisfaction that they have. It's a small thing to endure the complaint, but being repeatedly silenced in their pain breaks a person's spirit.
I'm sitting on a bench eating lunch and the bench has been designed so that it's impossible for a person to lie down on it. What's worse, depriving a person who has nothing of a place to lay their head, or making a place look 'untidy'?
The "haves" are showing understanding with sayings like the one in the title. That is how they see it, what more can they do? Invite you to join their relationship? It's up to the "have-nots" to manage their own lives however they see fit.
I think the term "there’s someone for everyone" is a lie
← View full post
And if you're blessed with a happy relationship why should the onus be on the have-nots to 'suck it up' rather than on the haves to show understanding? What is an annoying little complaint for you is for them, the closest substitute for satisfaction that they have. It's a small thing to endure the complaint, but being repeatedly silenced in their pain breaks a person's spirit.
I'm sitting on a bench eating lunch and the bench has been designed so that it's impossible for a person to lie down on it. What's worse, depriving a person who has nothing of a place to lay their head, or making a place look 'untidy'?
--
mauzi
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
The "haves" are showing understanding with sayings like the one in the title. That is how they see it, what more can they do? Invite you to join their relationship? It's up to the "have-nots" to manage their own lives however they see fit.