Good. Now that we take these very few isolated cases than people can barely remember and compare them with the vast majority of men assuming leading positions we can conclude that women are generally incapable of leadership, hence patriarchy is the only realistic option humanity has. This option is also highly successful when specific criteria are met. The white skin is definitely at least strongly positively associated to this, leading us to understand that white males are the best leaders of the world. The reality proves it by having the majority of leaders of developed countries as being white males. This last one is a fact, not an opinion, and it remains unchanged by the protests and the influence of various groups.
Umm, the New Zealand example is current right now! So you're quite happy for male dominated societies to take the credit for wars, just to give one example?
As for white skinned people being superior leaders, now you've revealed your true colours (unintended pun but I'll let it stand. They are certainly "superior" at invading other countries, often wiping out peaceful more civilised peoples in the process, in committing genocide and I repeat, in waging war.
There are no "more civilized people" that we wipe out. If they were truly more civilized we couldn't have wiped them out. We wipe out shitholes and we expand as more developed and civilized. We take over the world to replace it with our people. I am more than happy to take credit for wars that eliminate inferior people and replace them with superior people. The British empire and the German empire did so and we are now developed because of them. Hundreds of thousands of years of civilizations not inventing anything but being vermin to civilized people is more than enough for anybody to understand that some tribes must perish.
"There are no "more civilized people" that we wipe out. If they were truly more civilized we couldn't have wiped them out. We wipe out shitholes and we expand as more developed and civilized", ye of course, the West was more civilized than anywhere it conquered. In all fairness though, some of the peoples like the Chinese are really capable. I don't think they're really inferior.
They truly are. I don't remember the West conquering China. However, I am not defending every single action made by colonists and imperialists here, but the concept in general. Without replacing some toxic people, we are exposed to grooming gangs and terror, and we are at constant war with them. Either leave them alone and never let them in by very tight border control (which is hard due to a bunch of mentally challenged feminists who protest when Trump bans immigration from countries who refuse negotiations) or declare war and keep it so until you win. Any middleground means we lose our own people, and that should never happen. But you know, nowadays every leftist faggot who reads buzzfeed is a political strategist...The vermin of white guilt and faggotry is spreading...prepare for the battle.
I agree with the sentiments of what you say man. I'm on the left myself, and I'm ashamed to be more and more, there are so many pathetic people pushing pathetic sjw bullshit. Great empires have always conquered, the strong conquer the weak, and they always will. Certain parts of Africa were so backwards they didn't even have the damn wheel before British colonisation. I mean Christ. The fucking wheel eluded them. The West kind of butt raped China for a bit, but didn't annex them. Just wars to sell them opium and the like.
I think men should subjugate themselves to women
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
The NZ Prime Minister seems to be doing a very good job, but then there's the memory of Margaret Thatcher to take into account
--
WarriorGene
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Good. Now that we take these very few isolated cases than people can barely remember and compare them with the vast majority of men assuming leading positions we can conclude that women are generally incapable of leadership, hence patriarchy is the only realistic option humanity has. This option is also highly successful when specific criteria are met. The white skin is definitely at least strongly positively associated to this, leading us to understand that white males are the best leaders of the world. The reality proves it by having the majority of leaders of developed countries as being white males. This last one is a fact, not an opinion, and it remains unchanged by the protests and the influence of various groups.
--
Ellenna
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Umm, the New Zealand example is current right now! So you're quite happy for male dominated societies to take the credit for wars, just to give one example?
As for white skinned people being superior leaders, now you've revealed your true colours (unintended pun but I'll let it stand. They are certainly "superior" at invading other countries, often wiping out peaceful more civilised peoples in the process, in committing genocide and I repeat, in waging war.
--
WarriorGene
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
There are no "more civilized people" that we wipe out. If they were truly more civilized we couldn't have wiped them out. We wipe out shitholes and we expand as more developed and civilized. We take over the world to replace it with our people. I am more than happy to take credit for wars that eliminate inferior people and replace them with superior people. The British empire and the German empire did so and we are now developed because of them. Hundreds of thousands of years of civilizations not inventing anything but being vermin to civilized people is more than enough for anybody to understand that some tribes must perish.
--
bigbudchonga
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"There are no "more civilized people" that we wipe out. If they were truly more civilized we couldn't have wiped them out. We wipe out shitholes and we expand as more developed and civilized", ye of course, the West was more civilized than anywhere it conquered. In all fairness though, some of the peoples like the Chinese are really capable. I don't think they're really inferior.
--
WarriorGene
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
They truly are. I don't remember the West conquering China. However, I am not defending every single action made by colonists and imperialists here, but the concept in general. Without replacing some toxic people, we are exposed to grooming gangs and terror, and we are at constant war with them. Either leave them alone and never let them in by very tight border control (which is hard due to a bunch of mentally challenged feminists who protest when Trump bans immigration from countries who refuse negotiations) or declare war and keep it so until you win. Any middleground means we lose our own people, and that should never happen. But you know, nowadays every leftist faggot who reads buzzfeed is a political strategist...The vermin of white guilt and faggotry is spreading...prepare for the battle.
--
bigbudchonga
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
I agree with the sentiments of what you say man. I'm on the left myself, and I'm ashamed to be more and more, there are so many pathetic people pushing pathetic sjw bullshit. Great empires have always conquered, the strong conquer the weak, and they always will. Certain parts of Africa were so backwards they didn't even have the damn wheel before British colonisation. I mean Christ. The fucking wheel eluded them. The West kind of butt raped China for a bit, but didn't annex them. Just wars to sell them opium and the like.