Good observation. Now you need to prove that women would have done a better job in order to invalidate my statement. I would accept only one current female leader, Kolinda, or any potential female that is like her.
Good. Now that we take these very few isolated cases than people can barely remember and compare them with the vast majority of men assuming leading positions we can conclude that women are generally incapable of leadership, hence patriarchy is the only realistic option humanity has. This option is also highly successful when specific criteria are met. The white skin is definitely at least strongly positively associated to this, leading us to understand that white males are the best leaders of the world. The reality proves it by having the majority of leaders of developed countries as being white males. This last one is a fact, not an opinion, and it remains unchanged by the protests and the influence of various groups.
Umm, the New Zealand example is current right now! So you're quite happy for male dominated societies to take the credit for wars, just to give one example?
As for white skinned people being superior leaders, now you've revealed your true colours (unintended pun but I'll let it stand. They are certainly "superior" at invading other countries, often wiping out peaceful more civilised peoples in the process, in committing genocide and I repeat, in waging war.
There are no "more civilized people" that we wipe out. If they were truly more civilized we couldn't have wiped them out. We wipe out shitholes and we expand as more developed and civilized. We take over the world to replace it with our people. I am more than happy to take credit for wars that eliminate inferior people and replace them with superior people. The British empire and the German empire did so and we are now developed because of them. Hundreds of thousands of years of civilizations not inventing anything but being vermin to civilized people is more than enough for anybody to understand that some tribes must perish.
I think men should subjugate themselves to women
← View full post
All successful civilizations have been built by patriachy. Men build and lead the world.
--
Ellenna
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Not to mention very many unsuccessful ones
--
WarriorGene
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
Good observation. Now you need to prove that women would have done a better job in order to invalidate my statement. I would accept only one current female leader, Kolinda, or any potential female that is like her.
--
Ellenna
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
The NZ Prime Minister seems to be doing a very good job, but then there's the memory of Margaret Thatcher to take into account
--
WarriorGene
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Good. Now that we take these very few isolated cases than people can barely remember and compare them with the vast majority of men assuming leading positions we can conclude that women are generally incapable of leadership, hence patriarchy is the only realistic option humanity has. This option is also highly successful when specific criteria are met. The white skin is definitely at least strongly positively associated to this, leading us to understand that white males are the best leaders of the world. The reality proves it by having the majority of leaders of developed countries as being white males. This last one is a fact, not an opinion, and it remains unchanged by the protests and the influence of various groups.
--
Ellenna
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Umm, the New Zealand example is current right now! So you're quite happy for male dominated societies to take the credit for wars, just to give one example?
As for white skinned people being superior leaders, now you've revealed your true colours (unintended pun but I'll let it stand. They are certainly "superior" at invading other countries, often wiping out peaceful more civilised peoples in the process, in committing genocide and I repeat, in waging war.
--
WarriorGene
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
See More Comments =>
There are no "more civilized people" that we wipe out. If they were truly more civilized we couldn't have wiped them out. We wipe out shitholes and we expand as more developed and civilized. We take over the world to replace it with our people. I am more than happy to take credit for wars that eliminate inferior people and replace them with superior people. The British empire and the German empire did so and we are now developed because of them. Hundreds of thousands of years of civilizations not inventing anything but being vermin to civilized people is more than enough for anybody to understand that some tribes must perish.