Wouldn't that just be someone who has great talent though and not necessarily mean they slept with a ton of people but learned with whomever they are with or dated before . I can see them being more adventurous maybe or easier to talk into things but then again a comfortable relationship should be pretty easy to master sex and try all kinds of stuff .. HMMM , maybe you are right I don't know but I just think I prefer the clean women who don't fuck the block party xD LOL
Nobody is born with a 'talent' for sex. It is only mastered by having a variety of lovers and a variety of experiences. The more experienced someone is with sex, the more they should know how to please their partner, which is the whole point in having sex (for fun), is it not?
I think he's saying that you can get a lot of experience with a small amount of people & you don't have to have fucked the football team to be a good root
yes that is what I am saying , I understand what gypsy is saying but I believe one can definitely gain a lot of experience and improve their sex performance with even just one partner because it seems to me having run through a list wouldn't make a difference really? the only difference meeting new people would offer is if the previous person wasn't willing to do things or experiment certain aspects of sex ... even still you don't need to fuck the city to improve or experiment . I also wouldn't be putting my mouth down on girls I don't even know , this would be a partner or long going sex partner as I just wouldn't feel close or comfortable enough with them to do so .... call me old fashion .
Though all the girl bits are all the same,each and every girl has different things that pleasure her. I don't agree that you can get much variety of experience with very few partners.
I don't think a slut is measured by how many partners a girl has, but by her attitude to those partners.
I see your point, but you have to remember, I was a teen and young adult in a time before STD's were a problem, and free love had nothing to do with money. We all had many partners and betrayal just wasn't a part if it.
A slut, IMO, is a gal that may have sex with a lot of partners, or not, but underneath it all she doesn't really like men. She likes SEX with men, but not men. So she tends to be promiscuous and unfaithful.
yeah that's true , I think a lot of girls have sex for attention or acceptance also and care less about the actual experience of it and value love making / fucking has .
I prefer sluts. So I guess I'll never marry.
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Wouldn't that just be someone who has great talent though and not necessarily mean they slept with a ton of people but learned with whomever they are with or dated before . I can see them being more adventurous maybe or easier to talk into things but then again a comfortable relationship should be pretty easy to master sex and try all kinds of stuff .. HMMM , maybe you are right I don't know but I just think I prefer the clean women who don't fuck the block party xD LOL
--
thegypsysailor
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Nobody is born with a 'talent' for sex. It is only mastered by having a variety of lovers and a variety of experiences. The more experienced someone is with sex, the more they should know how to please their partner, which is the whole point in having sex (for fun), is it not?
--
derpyderp
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
I think he's saying that you can get a lot of experience with a small amount of people & you don't have to have fucked the football team to be a good root
--
Aries
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
thegypsysailor
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
yes that is what I am saying , I understand what gypsy is saying but I believe one can definitely gain a lot of experience and improve their sex performance with even just one partner because it seems to me having run through a list wouldn't make a difference really? the only difference meeting new people would offer is if the previous person wasn't willing to do things or experiment certain aspects of sex ... even still you don't need to fuck the city to improve or experiment . I also wouldn't be putting my mouth down on girls I don't even know , this would be a partner or long going sex partner as I just wouldn't feel close or comfortable enough with them to do so .... call me old fashion .
Though all the girl bits are all the same,each and every girl has different things that pleasure her. I don't agree that you can get much variety of experience with very few partners.
I don't think a slut is measured by how many partners a girl has, but by her attitude to those partners.
--
Aries
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
derpyderp
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I think my previous comment on a slut defines it pretty well , what do you think?
--
thegypsysailor
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I see your point, but you have to remember, I was a teen and young adult in a time before STD's were a problem, and free love had nothing to do with money. We all had many partners and betrayal just wasn't a part if it.
A slut, IMO, is a gal that may have sex with a lot of partners, or not, but underneath it all she doesn't really like men. She likes SEX with men, but not men. So she tends to be promiscuous and unfaithful.
--
Aries
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
yeah that's true , I think a lot of girls have sex for attention or acceptance also and care less about the actual experience of it and value love making / fucking has .
Well I was talking from a girls perspective but yeah, OK