The burden of proof is on the person who believes in the existence of whatever it may be.
If I told you pies exist, and you said pies didn't exist, it would be my job to go and buy a pie, as opposed to your job to convince me that it's impossible.
In my case, nobody has been able to buy me a tangible-enough pie.
I'm an Atheist and still respect people of faith
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
The burden of proof is on the person who believes in the existence of whatever it may be.
If I told you pies exist, and you said pies didn't exist, it would be my job to go and buy a pie, as opposed to your job to convince me that it's impossible.
In my case, nobody has been able to buy me a tangible-enough pie.
--
Tommythecaty
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
It’s not a topic that can be proven or disproven, it’s beyond burden of proof for either side.
If you believe there’s nothing there without being able to prove it, it’s faith.
If you believe there’s something there without being able to prove it, it’s faith.
Agnosticism is the only rational mindset, not claiming to know that which cannot be known.