Amazing. Okay. Let me break this all down for you.
I'm not saying that only ten would have a problem. I'm saying that's my estimated casualty count before the insurgency effectively died all the same. You're perpetually missing my position that this would be akin to a grown ass man giving his toddler a slap on the wrist and putting him in the corner. What the toddler will "allow" his father to get away with doesn't enter the equation because the toddler doesn't have the capability to warrant such authority. The father also isn't going to have to break out some high-end UFC, real life ninja shit on the toddler. Things are going to go as the father wants and the toddler is going to be fine. I know; it's an absolutely disgusting thought to a redneck's wet dream of being an action star.
As for the Second Amendment, I believe we have had a genuine misunderstanding here. I'm actually talking about a scenario in which the law has been revised and those fighting back are breaking the law. That said, that's not super important because I honestly don't think it would look that much different if the government did this in a brute force manner either unless it was apparent they were going to follow this up with something absolutely heinous like concentration camps. So we can just continue as if I'd asserted as you thought. That's fine.
As for the children, would you like to double down on that? Turns out I actually told you multiple times that was the beauty of the particular study. Another well-known and undisputed fact is that liberals attain a higher level of education on average. Regarding samples demonstrating that adult liberals had higher IQs, conservatives often countered with claims that the greater academic education merely gave liberals the illusion of being more outright intelligent. This was despite the fact that the tests weren't based on preexisting knowledge but deductive abilities and spatial awareness.
I specifically told you that the beauty herein resided in the fact that they tested the IQs of children with minimal education and political exposure only to check back in as adults and learn that not only did those with lower IQs more often end up conservative, there was a correlation between how low their IQs were and how strongly conservative they were.
The graph itself is from the actual study and merely plots the data. It's a very mechanical, objective thing with zero room for opinion. Likewise, the results it shows are not a matter of opinion. It's mathematical, as objective as it gets. Your best bet is to claim fake news. You can't argue the purported numbers aren't as they're purported without divorcing reality.
Before I conclude, let me just comment on how funny that desperate straw-grab would be anyway, as if the more intelligent kids all magically suffered head injuries that reduced their IQs before becoming adult liberals. That got an IRL LOL out of me, so thanks for that.
"--we both know how it ended."
Hey! See, sometimes we do agree.
Of course you don't like talking to me. I've no doubt that you _thoroughly_ regret the very first exchange because you don't enjoy debate and learning new things. You only care about being right and you loathe the fact that I take the time to prove you wrong rather than you adjusting accordingly with newfound knowledge.
I knew the atlanta shooter was white before the news
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Amazing. Okay. Let me break this all down for you.
I'm not saying that only ten would have a problem. I'm saying that's my estimated casualty count before the insurgency effectively died all the same. You're perpetually missing my position that this would be akin to a grown ass man giving his toddler a slap on the wrist and putting him in the corner. What the toddler will "allow" his father to get away with doesn't enter the equation because the toddler doesn't have the capability to warrant such authority. The father also isn't going to have to break out some high-end UFC, real life ninja shit on the toddler. Things are going to go as the father wants and the toddler is going to be fine. I know; it's an absolutely disgusting thought to a redneck's wet dream of being an action star.
As for the Second Amendment, I believe we have had a genuine misunderstanding here. I'm actually talking about a scenario in which the law has been revised and those fighting back are breaking the law. That said, that's not super important because I honestly don't think it would look that much different if the government did this in a brute force manner either unless it was apparent they were going to follow this up with something absolutely heinous like concentration camps. So we can just continue as if I'd asserted as you thought. That's fine.
As for the children, would you like to double down on that? Turns out I actually told you multiple times that was the beauty of the particular study. Another well-known and undisputed fact is that liberals attain a higher level of education on average. Regarding samples demonstrating that adult liberals had higher IQs, conservatives often countered with claims that the greater academic education merely gave liberals the illusion of being more outright intelligent. This was despite the fact that the tests weren't based on preexisting knowledge but deductive abilities and spatial awareness.
I specifically told you that the beauty herein resided in the fact that they tested the IQs of children with minimal education and political exposure only to check back in as adults and learn that not only did those with lower IQs more often end up conservative, there was a correlation between how low their IQs were and how strongly conservative they were.
The graph itself is from the actual study and merely plots the data. It's a very mechanical, objective thing with zero room for opinion. Likewise, the results it shows are not a matter of opinion. It's mathematical, as objective as it gets. Your best bet is to claim fake news. You can't argue the purported numbers aren't as they're purported without divorcing reality.
Before I conclude, let me just comment on how funny that desperate straw-grab would be anyway, as if the more intelligent kids all magically suffered head injuries that reduced their IQs before becoming adult liberals. That got an IRL LOL out of me, so thanks for that.
"--we both know how it ended."
Hey! See, sometimes we do agree.
Of course you don't like talking to me. I've no doubt that you _thoroughly_ regret the very first exchange because you don't enjoy debate and learning new things. You only care about being right and you loathe the fact that I take the time to prove you wrong rather than you adjusting accordingly with newfound knowledge.
--
[Old Memory]
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
And that's certainly all fantastic. Good talk.
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm glad you finally understand. Good talk indeed.