Okay, I can maybe agree to have someone sentenced when there is at least majority of actual proof, if the convict rate would be extremely low otherwise. If someone is found innocent or even that the original court didn't do a good job (despite no new evidence) then they should be set free and compensated. But proof beyond accusation is a minimum in every crime case.
I find it unreasonable how men and women hate each other
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Okay, I can maybe agree to have someone sentenced when there is at least majority of actual proof, if the convict rate would be extremely low otherwise. If someone is found innocent or even that the original court didn't do a good job (despite no new evidence) then they should be set free and compensated. But proof beyond accusation is a minimum in every crime case.