You have, three times, used a term which divides a group of people [who believe that an ancient anointing ceremony confers special or magical powers to someone] from other people. The use of this term might be offensive to some people, whether they are religious, or whether they are not religious.
Why are you creating division in society?
You have made a reference to a deity. To which deity are you referring?
'Satan', is not, or never was, a real person or thing. This is a fictitious character created through a very badly corrupted old story of a man who fell off a horse.
Please do not use -ists or -isms, as these further contribute to division in society.
Thank you, and please make a concerted effort to make yourself indivisible.
The King James Version of the Bible not corrupted? Are you serious? Try Young's Literal Translation. This version is less corrupt, but is also very corrupted.
The truth of the matter is: a version of the Bible that is not corrupt, is simply no longer available. The Bible had already become very badly corrupted within a century after Jesua's death. There are simply no copies of earlier texts available, from which to translate.
I think that Ron White had said it best, "You can't fix stupid".
"Thank you, and please make a concerted effort to make yourself indivisible."
This...from the most divisive person on this site.
Unjustly insinuating that GuessWho is stupid while quoting a comedian, might be an attempt at humor, but would qualify for dividing people beyond anything using "ists" and "isms" ever could.
Despite being correct about much of your biblical critique, you cast stones at those you intend to help, rendering your words obsolete.
You're almost starting to sound human...but every time I've thought that before, you returned to your mechanical and repetitive diatribe of insults and nitpicking.
Society is divided. Deal with it.
If my anti-globalisation comment pisses you off, good.
The people that attempt to unite the world into a single way of thinking (in order to rule over them with a global government) are the Satanists.
It doesn't matter whether Satan is real or not, for Satanism is. And these people have evil intentions.
They want a society without divisions, so that they can be its dictators.
So, let society be divided. For division is good. I embrace the difference and uniqueness of different people and strive to keep it that way.
If society was undivided and all shared the same mindset as you, you would have no need to comment as there would be no comments by others representing any opinion different from your own, and thus, you would be come very, very bored.
The KJV bible IS, itself somewhat corrupted. I never said it wasn't.
It is just significantly less corrupted than many of the newer translations that have been purposely mistranslated to spread the message that the origination that translates/distributes/sponsors it wants you to read, rather than that of the original authors.
Playing into the hands of Satanists by fighting divisions in society is the real stupidity here.
I am attempting to put an end to all [destructive] divisions in society, and to put an end to politics.
Your statement that,"If society was undivided and all shared the same mindset as you, you would have no need to comment as there would be no comments by others representing any opinion different from your own, and thus, you would be come very, very bored.", is a fallacy and is ludicrous. There will always be differences of opinion in society, and plenty of interesting topics to communicate on. These can all be discussed in a civil, meaningful way, which is true and factual with the actual nature of the Universe (as well as things which you presently know nothing or very little about, and can't quite be classified as 'natural').
This is what living within 'Civilisation' means.
Please do not use -ists or -isms, as these are religiously and / or politically charged, and contribute to divisions in society.
Thank you.
"Satan', is a fictitious character.
Who are you fighting against, people who support fictitious characters (in general), or people who support just the one previously named fictitious character?
I feel like I'm a mixture of being Christian and being agnostic
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
You have, three times, used a term which divides a group of people [who believe that an ancient anointing ceremony confers special or magical powers to someone] from other people. The use of this term might be offensive to some people, whether they are religious, or whether they are not religious.
Why are you creating division in society?
You have made a reference to a deity. To which deity are you referring?
'Satan', is not, or never was, a real person or thing. This is a fictitious character created through a very badly corrupted old story of a man who fell off a horse.
Please do not use -ists or -isms, as these further contribute to division in society.
Thank you, and please make a concerted effort to make yourself indivisible.
The King James Version of the Bible not corrupted? Are you serious? Try Young's Literal Translation. This version is less corrupt, but is also very corrupted.
The truth of the matter is: a version of the Bible that is not corrupt, is simply no longer available. The Bible had already become very badly corrupted within a century after Jesua's death. There are simply no copies of earlier texts available, from which to translate.
I think that Ron White had said it best, "You can't fix stupid".
--
DiamondGirl
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
[Old Memory]
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
GuessWho
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
shut the hell up already. please Rabbi ur killin me oy vay!
"Thank you, and please make a concerted effort to make yourself indivisible."
This...from the most divisive person on this site.
Unjustly insinuating that GuessWho is stupid while quoting a comedian, might be an attempt at humor, but would qualify for dividing people beyond anything using "ists" and "isms" ever could.
Despite being correct about much of your biblical critique, you cast stones at those you intend to help, rendering your words obsolete.
You're almost starting to sound human...but every time I've thought that before, you returned to your mechanical and repetitive diatribe of insults and nitpicking.
Society is divided. Deal with it.
If my anti-globalisation comment pisses you off, good.
The people that attempt to unite the world into a single way of thinking (in order to rule over them with a global government) are the Satanists.
It doesn't matter whether Satan is real or not, for Satanism is. And these people have evil intentions.
They want a society without divisions, so that they can be its dictators.
So, let society be divided. For division is good. I embrace the difference and uniqueness of different people and strive to keep it that way.
If society was undivided and all shared the same mindset as you, you would have no need to comment as there would be no comments by others representing any opinion different from your own, and thus, you would be come very, very bored.
The KJV bible IS, itself somewhat corrupted. I never said it wasn't.
It is just significantly less corrupted than many of the newer translations that have been purposely mistranslated to spread the message that the origination that translates/distributes/sponsors it wants you to read, rather than that of the original authors.
Playing into the hands of Satanists by fighting divisions in society is the real stupidity here.
--
suckonthis9
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I am 'dealing with it'.
I am attempting to put an end to all [destructive] divisions in society, and to put an end to politics.
Your statement that,"If society was undivided and all shared the same mindset as you, you would have no need to comment as there would be no comments by others representing any opinion different from your own, and thus, you would be come very, very bored.", is a fallacy and is ludicrous. There will always be differences of opinion in society, and plenty of interesting topics to communicate on. These can all be discussed in a civil, meaningful way, which is true and factual with the actual nature of the Universe (as well as things which you presently know nothing or very little about, and can't quite be classified as 'natural').
This is what living within 'Civilisation' means.
Please do not use -ists or -isms, as these are religiously and / or politically charged, and contribute to divisions in society.
Thank you.
"Satan', is a fictitious character.
Who are you fighting against, people who support fictitious characters (in general), or people who support just the one previously named fictitious character?
--
GuessWho
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You're fighting a futile battle for society will always be divided as that's what makes it work the way it does.
People don't like change and will never accept a society without these divisions.
Your anti-division commentary is nothing more than a slight annoyance.
...so go back to living in your little dream world where you can actually do something about it.