The only idiot who agree with drunk driving is you retard. It's consent vs responsibility. If you choose to get drunk drunk than drive you are responsible for the results. If however you are drunk and someone sees a free pass you can not consent. There is a difference between consent vs responsibility. A child can be responsible for graffitying the wall. However saying that they can consent to sex with an adult is still no even if that pedophile wants the consent to be there.
What are you talking about? I just said "No I don't think people should be allowed to drive drunk" and that "if someone makes the decision to drive drunk then I do think they should be prosecuted for it". You call me an idiot but you're the one who seems unable to read.
I don't think there is a difference between consent and responsibility. People just treat sex differently from every other decision that someone could make when drunk, because they still view sex as a sensitive subject because of some lingering societal sexual repression. It should be treated equally to any other decision made when drunk.
Well ultimately, the resonsibility for a child graffitying a wall falls on the parents. They have to pay for the damages. Besides, children understand what they're doing when they graffiti a wall, they don't fully understand sex yet though. So they can consent to graffitying, but can't consent to sex.
I don't agree with the idea of being too drunk to consent
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
The only idiot who agree with drunk driving is you retard. It's consent vs responsibility. If you choose to get drunk drunk than drive you are responsible for the results. If however you are drunk and someone sees a free pass you can not consent. There is a difference between consent vs responsibility. A child can be responsible for graffitying the wall. However saying that they can consent to sex with an adult is still no even if that pedophile wants the consent to be there.
--
JellyBeanBandit
11 months ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
What are you talking about? I just said "No I don't think people should be allowed to drive drunk" and that "if someone makes the decision to drive drunk then I do think they should be prosecuted for it". You call me an idiot but you're the one who seems unable to read.
I don't think there is a difference between consent and responsibility. People just treat sex differently from every other decision that someone could make when drunk, because they still view sex as a sensitive subject because of some lingering societal sexual repression. It should be treated equally to any other decision made when drunk.
Well ultimately, the resonsibility for a child graffitying a wall falls on the parents. They have to pay for the damages. Besides, children understand what they're doing when they graffiti a wall, they don't fully understand sex yet though. So they can consent to graffitying, but can't consent to sex.