Op didn't say anything about being "convinced" you'd committed a crime he's talking about people who actually did commit those crimes. So unless you're saying that you don't think murder and rape are "heinous crimes" then your logic is flawed.
I actually lold even harder when I saw that this comment has a negative vote (I swear it wasn't me) I'm leaving it there, it's funnier cuz someone took this seriously and got offended 😂 (Probably just derelict being butthurt again)
Without a trial and all the facts, how would one know the person "actually" committed the crime, unless caught in the act? Even with trials people get it wrong more than we'd like to admit.
We have laws that address people being killed while a crime is being committed so that doesn't qualify as vigilantism, which is post fact.
But no one said it was "without trial and facts", so your logic is flawed. "How would one know"? Umm, by witnessing it? Why are you assuming the post has anything to do with the legal system?
how do you know the verdict of the trial was right? The legal system is extremely corrupt and really only cares about putting on a show and seeing which side comes out winning than actually finding if someone is guilty or innocent.
I dont, as I said we get it wrong more than we like to admit. I've been a victim of our system before so I hear you. It's still better than one dude being judge, jury and executioner though.
i believe vigilantism is right ... is it normal
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Op didn't say anything about being "convinced" you'd committed a crime he's talking about people who actually did commit those crimes. So unless you're saying that you don't think murder and rape are "heinous crimes" then your logic is flawed.
--
Zorak
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Kevinevan
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Prepare your asshole for extreme painal.
--
LGK4
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I actually lold even harder when I saw that this comment has a negative vote (I swear it wasn't me) I'm leaving it there, it's funnier cuz someone took this seriously and got offended 😂 (Probably just derelict being butthurt again)
--
Zorak
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I am serious this time....Prepare to be anally raped...............🐿
--
LGK4
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Lol so cute
Wtf that dumbass who replied to me deleted his comments so now my replies got scattered
--
Zorak
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Or he blocked you...
--
LGK4
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Hahaha!! I can still see his comments tho.
Without a trial and all the facts, how would one know the person "actually" committed the crime, unless caught in the act? Even with trials people get it wrong more than we'd like to admit.
We have laws that address people being killed while a crime is being committed so that doesn't qualify as vigilantism, which is post fact.
--
LGK4
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
SmokeEverything
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
But no one said it was "without trial and facts", so your logic is flawed. "How would one know"? Umm, by witnessing it? Why are you assuming the post has anything to do with the legal system?
how do you know the verdict of the trial was right? The legal system is extremely corrupt and really only cares about putting on a show and seeing which side comes out winning than actually finding if someone is guilty or innocent.
--
Kevinevan
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I dont, as I said we get it wrong more than we like to admit. I've been a victim of our system before so I hear you. It's still better than one dude being judge, jury and executioner though.