That last bit of my comment means tax payers shouldn't be paying for someone elses mistake (abortion) especially when there's countless contraceptives out there which boils down to irresponsibility, the next step is already here, tax payers paying for sex changes.
I don't think you see the part where people need to take responsibility for their actions, its like having car insurance except there's no "abortion insurance" and somebody has to pay.
"but she may not find the experience worth the money"
Ok sure fine but what if she doesn't have the money for an abortion due to her irresponsibility? Then either the FATHER provides support for 9 months and gets sole custody of the baby or oh yeah, it isn't worth the MONEY to her, then she shall get one publicly funded abortion and if it happens again it's mandatory sterilization, although I'd opt for the first. Sound fair?
Some women do need to stop having children without settling down.
If it happens more than once it's no longer an accident.
First time abortions can have valid reasons, mainly health related. Though that risk alone should warrant greater caution when having sex.
If the government can put a price on children, then they can pay for the children.
For your idea, in addition to the 9 months, the father should also provide for the time it'll take the woman to heal and fully recover. Once the woman is healthy enough to work and continue on with her life his job would be done.
And since you bring up sterilization, keep in mind that is easier for a man to have his "tubes" tied and they can still be untied. Whereas its permanent for a woman and not all of them can have it.
A good buddy of mine years ago accidentally choped off two of his fingers while trying to fix a running lawn mover, the first time was an accident. If he did it a second... I'll leave that one up to you.
Hypothetically Speaking
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Pay her to carry the baby and give it to him once its born? Sounds reasonable, but she may not find the experience worth the money.
And if the government isn't willing to pay for abortions, then it needs to lower the cost of adoption.
As for the last bit of your comment, that's a bit random and highly irrelevant
--
LittleGirl-BASHEDandSODOMISED
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That last bit of my comment means tax payers shouldn't be paying for someone elses mistake (abortion) especially when there's countless contraceptives out there which boils down to irresponsibility, the next step is already here, tax payers paying for sex changes.
I don't think you see the part where people need to take responsibility for their actions, its like having car insurance except there's no "abortion insurance" and somebody has to pay.
"but she may not find the experience worth the money"
Ok sure fine but what if she doesn't have the money for an abortion due to her irresponsibility? Then either the FATHER provides support for 9 months and gets sole custody of the baby or oh yeah, it isn't worth the MONEY to her, then she shall get one publicly funded abortion and if it happens again it's mandatory sterilization, although I'd opt for the first. Sound fair?
--
Grimaldi
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Some women do need to stop having children without settling down.
If it happens more than once it's no longer an accident.
First time abortions can have valid reasons, mainly health related. Though that risk alone should warrant greater caution when having sex.
If the government can put a price on children, then they can pay for the children.
For your idea, in addition to the 9 months, the father should also provide for the time it'll take the woman to heal and fully recover. Once the woman is healthy enough to work and continue on with her life his job would be done.
And since you bring up sterilization, keep in mind that is easier for a man to have his "tubes" tied and they can still be untied. Whereas its permanent for a woman and not all of them can have it.
--
LittleGirl-BASHEDandSODOMISED
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
A good buddy of mine years ago accidentally choped off two of his fingers while trying to fix a running lawn mover, the first time was an accident. If he did it a second... I'll leave that one up to you.
It was nice talking you, later.