burning to death would indeed suck more than drowning because when you drown, you pass out after a few seconds due to lack of oxygen in the brain... whilst being burnt to death it would only be a matter of a persons certain pain tolerance and how long it would take them to go into shock, which could be a matter of seconds or several minutes.
Depends. Let's say your house was on fire, you would have most likely died from the carbon monoxide. But if it was direct contact like having your body torched it would be horrible. Having the liquid evaporating out of you!
how would u rather die??
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
burning to death would indeed suck more than drowning because when you drown, you pass out after a few seconds due to lack of oxygen in the brain... whilst being burnt to death it would only be a matter of a persons certain pain tolerance and how long it would take them to go into shock, which could be a matter of seconds or several minutes.
--
Shinigami_Pwner
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Depends. Let's say your house was on fire, you would have most likely died from the carbon monoxide. But if it was direct contact like having your body torched it would be horrible. Having the liquid evaporating out of you!
--
Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
And you suffocate too.