Possibly. I guess it isn't impossible, but if we can cause as much damage as we have in this time, and keep progressing at the rate we do, we're going to only get worse. We'll end up wiping out humanity over an over again.
But each new humanity won't know it's previous humanity....just like we think God (or something) created us and we're the only ones, that's how every one before and after us is and will be. The problem is, we haven't discovered a way to preserve our artifacts, knowledge, writings and such for the next race. But we're never thinking of that ever, or at least untill it's too late. Thus the humor in it all.
See how the US keeps gold in Ft Knox? Well, in the next human race, they will have a gold rush around there just like how today we have them in CA and AK. Were CA and AK previous forts? Mayyybeeee.....Same with all the other crap we find, I find it suspicious that we find things in 'veins'...there has to be more to it.
Personally, I doubt it is little more than co-incidence. Unless a previous evolution of human beings was develishly clever, there are probably sound scientific explanations for most things like the gold rush.
I doubt humans would be smart enough to purposely leave behind a seperate DNA thing, but not leave behind any way of communicating it. That would be silly of them, especially when we probably DO have the technology.
How do think human beings will be
← View full post
Possibly extinct, if we don't control the plethora of things about to kill us all in only a few centuries at the longest.
--
wigsplitz
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
But don't you think it's reasonable that we could become extinct in the next 100 years and be back by a million, from a DNA stew we leave behind?
--
dom180
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Possibly. I guess it isn't impossible, but if we can cause as much damage as we have in this time, and keep progressing at the rate we do, we're going to only get worse. We'll end up wiping out humanity over an over again.
--
wigsplitz
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
But each new humanity won't know it's previous humanity....just like we think God (or something) created us and we're the only ones, that's how every one before and after us is and will be. The problem is, we haven't discovered a way to preserve our artifacts, knowledge, writings and such for the next race. But we're never thinking of that ever, or at least untill it's too late. Thus the humor in it all.
See how the US keeps gold in Ft Knox? Well, in the next human race, they will have a gold rush around there just like how today we have them in CA and AK. Were CA and AK previous forts? Mayyybeeee.....Same with all the other crap we find, I find it suspicious that we find things in 'veins'...there has to be more to it.
--
dom180
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Personally, I doubt it is little more than co-incidence. Unless a previous evolution of human beings was develishly clever, there are probably sound scientific explanations for most things like the gold rush.
I doubt humans would be smart enough to purposely leave behind a seperate DNA thing, but not leave behind any way of communicating it. That would be silly of them, especially when we probably DO have the technology.