The problem is that the mods don't discriminate. The volume of input never affects the quality. They just go through the lot and approve almost everything.
They need to be more particular.
If nobody criticized establishment, we'd live in a world of rubber stamps and Honey Boo-Boo reruns.
Oh wait. We do. Because people don't offer solutions.
Most estabishments are criticized often enough. Everyone has individual preferences that can't always be tended to. Some say the mods let too much through, others feel their stories are rejected too often. I just ignore the stories i don't find worthy rather than pining over them. Who are any of us, including the mods, to say that someone's question is not valid just because we don't like it? Someone else might still relate to the question and want to add input even if you don't.
Btw, I don't live in honey boo boo world. If you are watching reruns of it you are supporting and enabling it.
You live on the same planet I do. I don't watch it, but commercial breaks are riddled with adds for it and newsstands are plastered with her picture. The show would disappear if there wasn't a following. Reality shows like that exemplify the degeneration of sociological integrity. Our collective I.Q. is dropping. You're a part of the human race...so you're living in a Honey Boo Boo world.
Establishments aren't criticized enough. It's one thing to look down on me if I just sat here and bitched about how it sucks, but I didn't. I offered constructive alternatives.
If you proposed that quality is subjective, I'd give you that. You touched on that a little, but most of your attack was directed at my criticism...which I won't apologize for.
Has IIN gone stale?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I make plenty.
The problem is that the mods don't discriminate. The volume of input never affects the quality. They just go through the lot and approve almost everything.
They need to be more particular.
If nobody criticized establishment, we'd live in a world of rubber stamps and Honey Boo-Boo reruns.
Oh wait. We do. Because people don't offer solutions.
I tried.
Thanks for your input.
--
charli.m
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
4
4
-
Freedom_
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If you saw the unmod section, you'd be disappointed to see how many quality podts are rejected in favour of the shite.
Most estabishments are criticized often enough. Everyone has individual preferences that can't always be tended to. Some say the mods let too much through, others feel their stories are rejected too often. I just ignore the stories i don't find worthy rather than pining over them. Who are any of us, including the mods, to say that someone's question is not valid just because we don't like it? Someone else might still relate to the question and want to add input even if you don't.
Btw, I don't live in honey boo boo world. If you are watching reruns of it you are supporting and enabling it.
--
Anonymous Post Author
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You live on the same planet I do. I don't watch it, but commercial breaks are riddled with adds for it and newsstands are plastered with her picture. The show would disappear if there wasn't a following. Reality shows like that exemplify the degeneration of sociological integrity. Our collective I.Q. is dropping. You're a part of the human race...so you're living in a Honey Boo Boo world.
Establishments aren't criticized enough. It's one thing to look down on me if I just sat here and bitched about how it sucks, but I didn't. I offered constructive alternatives.
If you proposed that quality is subjective, I'd give you that. You touched on that a little, but most of your attack was directed at my criticism...which I won't apologize for.