This is pretty much a moronic statement. Evolve your mind, we are not cavemen? Contrary to what people would like believe, we will always be "human" with innate responses/desire for the best possible person to "mate" with. Being attracted to another person will always be uncontrollable, as to who/why you're attracted to someone. Based on first impressions, lacking any knowledge as to what someone's personality entails.
But attraction in terms of "dating", who you choose to engage in longer term commitments with, is much different. There are plenty of people the majority will always have an uncontrollable desire for, based on looks alone, but for most, the attraction and desire can subside, given the person can not be your type emotionally/personality wise, or just have generally unappealing factors, to them. Yet that still doesn't change the fact that this "type" of person would have a good majority's attention based on a first glance/receive the first pick in terms of opportunity, to get to know them better etc.
Attraction is human nature, it will always be. This doesn't mean one is living like a caveman, so to speak, or not evolved, mentally. It just makes one human. It's funny when looks comes into play, online, because everyone wants to simply sound the most righteous in their responses, with a "Look past looks, like I do", attitude. Which is not only a sanctimonious attitude (as everyone is "guilty", if you want to call it that) of being attracted to someone incredibly good looking, sexually. Of course factors can change the outlook, ultimately, if the person has internally unappealing traits, but it doesn't change the fact that given the opportunity, most would attempt to court this "type" of person, whether sexually or engage in conversation. Based on looks alone.
It's easy to sound like a incredibly moral/appropriate person online, or if one only has the means of dating unconventionally attractive people, only, due to their own looks. But it does not make it true or correct, everyone wants the BEST they can possibly attain. Everyone. If THEY claim otherwise, they are the ones' lying. Nobody wants 30% or less, looks, 70% compatible. Even 10% looks, 90% compatible. Everyone would like the best of both worlds, if they can attain that. 100% in the "looks" department, 100% compatible with you. It's not as complex as people like to make it, for the sake of debate or sounding so incredibly moral/having the best responses or attitude.
Girls: Reaction to unattractive male's moves on you?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
This is pretty much a moronic statement. Evolve your mind, we are not cavemen? Contrary to what people would like believe, we will always be "human" with innate responses/desire for the best possible person to "mate" with. Being attracted to another person will always be uncontrollable, as to who/why you're attracted to someone. Based on first impressions, lacking any knowledge as to what someone's personality entails.
But attraction in terms of "dating", who you choose to engage in longer term commitments with, is much different. There are plenty of people the majority will always have an uncontrollable desire for, based on looks alone, but for most, the attraction and desire can subside, given the person can not be your type emotionally/personality wise, or just have generally unappealing factors, to them. Yet that still doesn't change the fact that this "type" of person would have a good majority's attention based on a first glance/receive the first pick in terms of opportunity, to get to know them better etc.
Attraction is human nature, it will always be. This doesn't mean one is living like a caveman, so to speak, or not evolved, mentally. It just makes one human. It's funny when looks comes into play, online, because everyone wants to simply sound the most righteous in their responses, with a "Look past looks, like I do", attitude. Which is not only a sanctimonious attitude (as everyone is "guilty", if you want to call it that) of being attracted to someone incredibly good looking, sexually. Of course factors can change the outlook, ultimately, if the person has internally unappealing traits, but it doesn't change the fact that given the opportunity, most would attempt to court this "type" of person, whether sexually or engage in conversation. Based on looks alone.
It's easy to sound like a incredibly moral/appropriate person online, or if one only has the means of dating unconventionally attractive people, only, due to their own looks. But it does not make it true or correct, everyone wants the BEST they can possibly attain. Everyone. If THEY claim otherwise, they are the ones' lying. Nobody wants 30% or less, looks, 70% compatible. Even 10% looks, 90% compatible. Everyone would like the best of both worlds, if they can attain that. 100% in the "looks" department, 100% compatible with you. It's not as complex as people like to make it, for the sake of debate or sounding so incredibly moral/having the best responses or attitude.