I don't get how people say that no body hair makes people look pre-pubescent. Even if a woman has no hair, she still has breasts and hips. Even if a guy has no hair he still is much taller and bigger than a child and has a bigger penis and even if they shave down there they might still have copious amounts of leg hair.
You make a very valid point. That's kind of how I see it, too. I mean I guess the part of it looks prepubescent comes from the fact that typically kids do not have hair on their genitals. Therefore it is a characteristic that a child has: no hair.
I don't know, I certainly don't want a hairy man, but that's just me.
Girls: Is pubic hair on guys a turn-off?
← View full post
It's perfectly fine.
To be honest, men with bare chests and bare crotches make me think of pre-pubescent boys. and THAT is a total turn off.
--
CheekyChihuahua
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I don't get how people say that no body hair makes people look pre-pubescent. Even if a woman has no hair, she still has breasts and hips. Even if a guy has no hair he still is much taller and bigger than a child and has a bigger penis and even if they shave down there they might still have copious amounts of leg hair.
--
Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
seabird_71
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It still turns me off.
I like a MAN'S chest.
and frankly i have seen some men shave their balls. it made them look funny.
i mean i understand "trimming the bush to make the tree look taller" but totally removing all the other foliage sometimes makes things look weird
You make a very valid point. That's kind of how I see it, too. I mean I guess the part of it looks prepubescent comes from the fact that typically kids do not have hair on their genitals. Therefore it is a characteristic that a child has: no hair.
I don't know, I certainly don't want a hairy man, but that's just me.