"If you say two dudes can do as good as a woman and a man, doesn't that kinda take away womens unique value?"
No, not really. Two tall people, two cat people, and two Mac users can raise kids fine and I doubt anyone would disagree. But that doesn't mean short people, dog-lovers, or Windows users aren't "uniquely valuable," whatever that means.
"Its my opinion that both women and men have UNIQUE roles in raising a child optimally."
Now that's just sexist. Not everyone follows traditional gender roles.
Listen dude, I'm no expert on this. If you wanna debate me, watch some Jordan Peterson or Ben Shapiro videos about gender roles on you tube or something.
And also its not sexist unless I imply inequality, whitch I did not. Men and women are equal but different.
If you can't defend your opinion, maybe it's time to reevaluate it. It's not my responsibility to try and figure out what *your* justifications are.
Also, "equal but different" can definitely be sexist.
And finally, even *if* gay couples are not, on average, as good as parenting as straight couples are (which, by the way, you've provided no evidence or compelling reasoning for beyond "men and women have unique roles" - whatever that means), doesn't mean it should be illegal for them to get married or raise kids - not unless all gay couples are just so catastrophically bad at raising children that it counts as abuse/neglect, which is evidently false. After all, single parents may, on average, be less good at raising children than two parents. But single parents aren't and shouldn't be illegal, either.
Gay but against gay marriage? Iin?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
"If you say two dudes can do as good as a woman and a man, doesn't that kinda take away womens unique value?"
No, not really. Two tall people, two cat people, and two Mac users can raise kids fine and I doubt anyone would disagree. But that doesn't mean short people, dog-lovers, or Windows users aren't "uniquely valuable," whatever that means.
"Its my opinion that both women and men have UNIQUE roles in raising a child optimally."
Now that's just sexist. Not everyone follows traditional gender roles.
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Listen dude, I'm no expert on this. If you wanna debate me, watch some Jordan Peterson or Ben Shapiro videos about gender roles on you tube or something.
And also its not sexist unless I imply inequality, whitch I did not. Men and women are equal but different.
--
palehorse
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
If you can't defend your opinion, maybe it's time to reevaluate it. It's not my responsibility to try and figure out what *your* justifications are.
Also, "equal but different" can definitely be sexist.
And finally, even *if* gay couples are not, on average, as good as parenting as straight couples are (which, by the way, you've provided no evidence or compelling reasoning for beyond "men and women have unique roles" - whatever that means), doesn't mean it should be illegal for them to get married or raise kids - not unless all gay couples are just so catastrophically bad at raising children that it counts as abuse/neglect, which is evidently false. After all, single parents may, on average, be less good at raising children than two parents. But single parents aren't and shouldn't be illegal, either.