I'd love to see the look on your face if your loved one gets one of the types of cancer and is like, don't even worry about it, they're going to inject some cannabinol in me and i'ma be perfectly fine.
I'm not denying it *might* be effective. I'm saying you are massively exaggerating the capabilities, which you are (dare I say it, you 100% are :P). I know you know I'm right about that, or you wouldn't have bothered to try and deflect me.
People who tell lies about science bother me. My problem with you isn't about weed, it's that you lied about the credibility of the science to further your own ideology.
Yes, I could probably have gone without the 100% cure for cancer, since it hasn't been 5 years since they developed this new technique that has eliminated tumors in some people, because a "cure" is defined as something that doesn't allow the symptoms to come back for a minimum of five years. I do tend to exaggerate to make a point, but it doesn't make the idea any less true. And that is that how can people who are SOOOO anti marijuana dislike a plant that has cured, for now, some cases of tumors, and at the bare minimum, GREATLY reduces their size.
For all of you anti-marijuana IIN users.
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I'd love to see the look on your face if your loved one gets one of the types of cancer and is like, don't even worry about it, they're going to inject some cannabinol in me and i'ma be perfectly fine.
--
dom180
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
I'm not denying it *might* be effective. I'm saying you are massively exaggerating the capabilities, which you are (dare I say it, you 100% are :P). I know you know I'm right about that, or you wouldn't have bothered to try and deflect me.
People who tell lies about science bother me. My problem with you isn't about weed, it's that you lied about the credibility of the science to further your own ideology.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes, I could probably have gone without the 100% cure for cancer, since it hasn't been 5 years since they developed this new technique that has eliminated tumors in some people, because a "cure" is defined as something that doesn't allow the symptoms to come back for a minimum of five years. I do tend to exaggerate to make a point, but it doesn't make the idea any less true. And that is that how can people who are SOOOO anti marijuana dislike a plant that has cured, for now, some cases of tumors, and at the bare minimum, GREATLY reduces their size.