And how exactly was a 4 year old "damaged" by seeing a naked body and people having fun? It's absurd. People always worry about "the children" but children are natural nudists. If allowed, they would never wear clothes. A child seeing a naked body does not harm them. It satisfies a curiosity. Then seeing people performing sex act might be another story.
As I said on my other reply, "Yes, it's a naked body. That itself alone is nothing malicious. The human body is a beautiful thing".
I was referring to mamalukes such as this girl who's intentions are anything but to "satisfy a curiosity", towards children. More so when they know, perfectly well I might add, all the trouble they could cause by doing that in the vicinity of such audiences.
For the most part, I can agree with ya. Maybe I overreacted on this one. But as much as i'd like to agree on "Adam and Eveing" this whole situation, fuhgeddaboudit.
Exposing myself at fast food drive through
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
And how exactly was a 4 year old "damaged" by seeing a naked body and people having fun? It's absurd. People always worry about "the children" but children are natural nudists. If allowed, they would never wear clothes. A child seeing a naked body does not harm them. It satisfies a curiosity. Then seeing people performing sex act might be another story.
--
TonyLasagnaFromTheNeighborhood
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
As I said on my other reply, "Yes, it's a naked body. That itself alone is nothing malicious. The human body is a beautiful thing".
I was referring to mamalukes such as this girl who's intentions are anything but to "satisfy a curiosity", towards children. More so when they know, perfectly well I might add, all the trouble they could cause by doing that in the vicinity of such audiences.
For the most part, I can agree with ya. Maybe I overreacted on this one. But as much as i'd like to agree on "Adam and Eveing" this whole situation, fuhgeddaboudit.